| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| jni - problems when loading shared library | 29 Feb 2004 12:41 GMT | 9 |
Hi guys I need some help. I've made a little program written in c that compiles well with gcc. After compiling, i created a shared library with ld, without any problems again. But, when trying to load the library from a java code, i get an error saying:
|
| how the JVM for windows was developed | 27 Feb 2004 16:46 GMT | 3 |
how the JVM for windows was developed since MS never let anyone know the kernel details of their OSs? (no problem for linux as it is opensource..) Or do MS distribute kernel apis???
|
| Big perfs problems with IBM/JVM 1.4 | 27 Feb 2004 12:19 GMT | 5 |
I wrote a simple application that generates a pdf file using jasperreport. When i run this application with IBM jdk 1.3.1 it takes 10 seconds to generate the pdf file. When i run this application with IBM jdk 1.4.0 it takes 46 seconds to
|
| JVM doesn't free memory on WIndows 2000 | 26 Feb 2004 17:08 GMT | 1 |
Does anyone have a solution or workaround for the following problem; We run a GUI-application for 48 hours. We have intensive CORBA communication and presents the result in a map (based on ILOG software). We have tested our application with JProbe and it seems like we haven't got ...
|
| checkcast | 26 Feb 2004 12:30 GMT | 10 |
I have a small question about the checkcast operator. When I have to translate this kind of Java expression: (String) a Supposing a is on top of the stack, I will get the following bytecode:
|
| Java Memory-Limits | 26 Feb 2004 07:59 GMT | 3 |
does anbyody know whether there is a memory-limit for the -Xmx - Value. We consider a RAM-Expansion from 2GB to 6GB. But we found suspicous advices in java-mail-archives, which indicates that there is 2GB-Limit. We are ar currently running on RedHat 9 Kernel 2.4
|
| Calling C from Java | 23 Feb 2004 19:13 GMT | 2 |
This is my very first posting on this group. As a test I'm trying to find out how to call a C program from Java by using the "Hello World" example given on SUN's website at http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/native1.1/ . I have an IBM
|
| problem using seial port | 22 Feb 2004 20:19 GMT | 2 |
For a project at school I need to read data from port COM2. I used som examples from internet and created a project on it. Running the app it looks like there is no COM port available. This statment retuns null
|
| HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error | 18 Feb 2004 20:44 GMT | 1 |
I recently upgraded Java on my Linux web server to 1.4.2_03b. It runs fine as root but when I try to run as anyone else I get the following error: -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| Picojava I(II) documentation. | 18 Feb 2004 19:59 GMT | 1 |
I'm desperately searching for the Picojava I(II) "Architecture manual"(from 1998 or 1999 if I'm not mistaken). I was able to find several references to this document, but not the .pdf(???) itself. The Sun site is pretty much *dead* on the subject(their picoJava page is a
|
| major version 49? | 14 Feb 2004 13:05 GMT | 4 |
It looks like the JRE classes that come with the 1.5.0 beta have their major version set to 49. Does anyone know of any documentation available for this new version of the class file format? It appears that the signatures can now have "+" prepended to them, which I am
|
| Running Sun 1.4.2 in 32-bit mode on the Opteron (Linux) | 11 Feb 2004 22:48 GMT | 2 |
I have a dual Opteron running on Linux on which I'd like to run the Sun 1.4.2 JVM (which is only available in 32-bit as of now). I know Blackdown makes a 64-bit one, but Blackdown is not considered at the moment.
|
| VM Launcher | 11 Feb 2004 13:49 GMT | 1 |
I get the warning in Java Virtual Machine Launcher, Could not find the main class. How can I solve this problem? And how did it get there?
|
| Question about fcmpg & fcmpl | 09 Feb 2004 02:09 GMT | 2 |
this time I don't have a bug report on Oolong but just simple questions on two opcodes of the JVM: fcmpg and fcmpl. In fact, I'm not sure I understand them right. When I consult the VM Specs (on Sun's site), it says that these two
|
| 1.5.0 Bytecode Compatibility | 07 Feb 2004 10:41 GMT | 2 |
Most of the language changes in the new 1.5.0 Beta seem to be changes that could be implemented pretty simply by the compiler, without any changes made to the bytecode format. So, I'm curious...if I compile code that uses the new 1.5.0 features,
|