Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / Tools / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Freeware source code obfucator ??

Thread view: 
Soeren - 09 Nov 2003 19:45 GMT
I have found a number of freeware bytecode obfuscators, but I haven't seen
any freeware source code obfuscators. Are there any ?

Thanks in advance.

Signature

Med venlig hilsen / Best regards

S?ren Dalby

Roedy Green - 09 Nov 2003 21:35 GMT
>I have found a number of freeware bytecode obfuscators, but I haven't seen
>any freeware source code obfuscators. Are there any ?

see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/obfuscator.html

for your options.  What would be the advantage of a source code
obfuscator?

--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
Soeren - 09 Nov 2003 23:09 GMT
Hi Roedy, thanks for your reply

I have been told that proper bytecode obfuscation is impossible - Is this
wrong ? Can you protect your source good enough by bytocode obfuscation
alone ?? I thought of using both....

> >I have found a number of freeware bytecode obfuscators, but I haven't seen
> >any freeware source code obfuscators. Are there any ?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
> See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
Roedy Green - 09 Nov 2003 23:39 GMT
>I have been told that proper bytecode obfuscation is impossible - Is this
>wrong ? Can you protect your source good enough by bytocode obfuscation
>alone ?? I thought of using both....

The best obfuscation is native optimisation.  See
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/nativecompiler.html

Creating a standalone exe as you can with Jet professional
Jetperfect would likely be the hardest to crack since all the calls to
the standard library routine names are hidden.

Any sort of byte code is relatively easy to decompile.

I would not make any difference that I can see if you did the
obfuscation on the byte code or the source.

--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.