Not 100% sure this is the correct group, but here we go. I am about to
embark on learning java as I need it for an Open University Course starting
in Feb, they recommended reading Ivor Horton's Begining Java 2 which
arrived today. Apart from the SDK he also suggests getting a text editor
aimed at Java.
He suggests JCreator, any views on what its like? Would you recommend any
other free editors?
Thanks
Rach
mantaray - 30 Oct 2003 21:49 GMT
November edition of Linux Format magazine has reviews on free Java IDEs
-- Eclipse, NetBeans and JBuilder.
They gave Eclipse 7/10, NetBeans 9/10 and JBuilder 8/10.
> Not 100% sure this is the correct group, but here we go. I am about to
> embark on learning java as I need it for an Open University Course starting
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Rach
Thee_Psycho - 30 Oct 2003 22:33 GMT
Thanks for that! Totaly Off topic is Linux format any good?? I subscribe to
PC format but its endless modding and multimedia articles are putting me
off. Looking fro a Linux Mag the other daya nd wondered if Linux format had
the same issues
> November edition of Linux Format magazine has reviews on free Java IDEs
> -- Eclipse, NetBeans and JBuilder.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > Rach
mantaray - 30 Oct 2003 23:37 GMT
In my opinion, it's okay. Some of the stuff that it's good are pretty
trivial. Some are interesting. If it is explaining something, it starts
from very basic things, which is good, but it doesn't go to the deepest.
I didn't subscribe to it. I flip a few pages and if I find topics that
interest me, I buy it.
My disappointment with the November issue is that, it has so many
spelling mistakes, which annoys me.
> Thanks for that! Totaly Off topic is Linux format any good?? I subscribe to
> PC format but its endless modding and multimedia articles are putting me
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>>
>>>Rach
Matt O'Toole - 21 Nov 2003 03:08 GMT
> November edition of Linux Format magazine has reviews on free Java IDEs
> -- Eclipse, NetBeans and JBuilder.
> They gave Eclipse 7/10, NetBeans 9/10 and JBuilder 8/10.
All of these are *way* overkill for a beginning Java student. All you need is a
text editor, although you should have a real programmer's editor, something
better than Notepad. As a Notepad replacement, I like Textpad. In fact, every
Windows user should have it on their machine.
> > Not 100% sure this is the correct group, but here we go.
Yup, this is the place.
> > I am about to
> > embark on learning java as I need it for an Open University Course starting
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > He suggests JCreator, any views on what its like? Would you recommend any
> > other free editors?
JCreator is great -- the free version is perfect for what you want to do. It's
fast, very easy to use, and doesn't confuse you with a lot of crap you don't
need. It keeps projects together, and lets you see everything in one window.
Also, start lurking around www.javaranch.com
Happy Java coding!
Matt O.
Dale King - 21 Nov 2003 18:09 GMT
> > November edition of Linux Format magazine has reviews on free Java IDEs
> > -- Eclipse, NetBeans and JBuilder.
> > They gave Eclipse 7/10, NetBeans 9/10 and JBuilder 8/10.
>
> All of these are *way* overkill for a beginning Java student.
That much I agree with.
> All you need is a
> text editor, although you should have a real programmer's editor, something
> better than Notepad. As a Notepad replacement, I like Textpad. In fact, every
> Windows user should have it on their machine.
No. Then you saddle the beginning student with learning arcane text commands
whose parameters and intricate details he has no hope of understanding until
he learns the nuts and bolts of Java. And you've left him without a decent
debugger.
The right environment for a beginning Java student is the one designed
specifically for that purpose, BlueJ (www.bluej.org).
--
Dale King
Wald - 31 Oct 2003 16:36 GMT
> Not 100% sure this is the correct group, but here we go. I am
> about to embark on learning java as I need it for an Open
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> He suggests JCreator, any views on what its like? Would you
> recommend any other free editors?
Eclipse, NetBeans or Jbuilder have already been mentioned. However,
these are full-fledged IDEs and cover a lot more than just simple
Java-aimed text editing.
If you're starting out, I would suggest to begin with simpler tools
that really force you to learn the behind-the-scene workings of
Java.
Some suggestions:
ConTEXT Programmers Editor
http://fixedsys.com/context/
JEdit
http://www.jedit.org/
I don't think that JCreator is a bad start, either. It's just that
it's a free version of an otherwise commercial product, and
personally, I like the idea of something being totally free or even
open source. But that's personal taste, so you choose.
Regards,
Wald
Bjorn Abelli - 01 Nov 2003 16:38 GMT
"Thee_Psycho" wrote...
> [Horton] suggests JCreator, any views on what its like?
> Would you recommend any
> other free editors?
To some part it's a matter of taste, but what other background the student
has is also important. Another important aspect is on which operating system
you will work.
If you have some experience in programming in other languages, and hence
some experience in how to setup an arbitrary envirenoment, then some of
these can be the best choice, as they are possible to configure for several
other compilers than Java.
Crimson Editor
http://www.crimsoneditor.com/
ConTEXT Programmers Editor
http://fixedsys.com/context/
JCreator LE has some advantage over those if you're satisfied with an
environment that only copes with Java, as the installation process will be
simpler, and more of it comes "preconfigured" if you already have installed
the Java SDK.
Netbeans, Eclipse and JBuilder are very good development environments, but
since they contain so much, to a complete beginner, it's in most cases too
much, and should be considered first when the student is mature enough.
jEdit is also a good editor, and have absolutely an advantage over JCreator
as it's open source. However, JCreator has an advantage over jEdit as it's
written in C++ directly for Windows and hence much faster than any
Java-equivalent. So if that's an issue JCreator is still a good
recommendation.
However, there's another editor that's seems promising, with all the
benefits of JCreator, but doesn't seem to be "liteware":
GEL
http://www.gexperts.com/
The disadvantage of GEL is that it's still in Beta and contains some bugs,
but it's the most promising yet of editors for Java, written for native
Windows use, and unbloated.
Just my 2c.
Bjorn A
GALZ - 03 Nov 2003 11:39 GMT
I use JEdit , www.jedit.org
Dale King - 04 Nov 2003 18:39 GMT
> Not 100% sure this is the correct group, but here we go. I am about to
> embark on learning java as I need it for an Open University Course starting
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> He suggests JCreator, any views on what its like? Would you recommend any
> other free editors?
If you are truly just starting out in Java, then ignore all of the other
suggestions. While many of the IDE's suggested are good (I use Eclipse
myself), they are not the best suited for actually learning Java. The only
IDE you should consider is the one that is specifically designed for the
purpose of learning Java and OO programming. That IDE is BlueJ
(www.bluej.org). There are also books designed to acompany BlueJ. Check the
website.
--
Dale King
Matt O'Toole - 21 Nov 2003 19:34 GMT
> The only
> IDE you should consider is the one that is specifically designed for the
> purpose of learning Java and OO programming. That IDE is
Never let anyone tell you anything is "the only" -- especially with regard to
software.
Matt O.