Oh, what an intelligent come back! I ask you for a simple quote to back
up the lie that you have repeated hundreds of times now and I get
insulted. I know you are used to those who will believe anything as long
as it bashes Bush, but I won't oblige.

No, because the site you listed did not exist. But I have read the
transcript, which you have not refuted as being an inaccurate account of
the video. I posted the link to the transcript which contains nothing
like what you said it does.

So all I asked of you to was to:

- provide the quote where Rumsfeld "confesses" to the embezzelment of
trillions of dollars (even though the money is missing from before he
was secretary of defense).
- explain how these funds were somehow linked to Bush while he was
Governor of Texas.

- or you could admit that it is a lie and apologize to the group.

Since it appears that you are no longer repeating the lie then it looks
like you wimped out and refuse to admit that you have been spamming this
group with off-topic lies.

Now you resort to personal attacks. And I know what your motive is.
Blind, unswerving hatred. It doesn't really matter what the facts are to
you.

Oh, I've been to your propaganda site. It reminds me a lot of the
National Enquirer in terms of your journalistic standards. And there are
many grotesque, offensive pictures of war casualties that are
inappropriate for you to link to without providing warnings.

I have done nothing of the kind. I have never mentioned them. I have
only called you a liar and challenged you to prove me wrong. Since you
have not done so then that leads me to only one conclusion.

Sorry, I haven't yet seen that post or email with the quote of the
confession and explanation of how the loss of trillions of dollars
during the Clinton administration has anything to do with Bush.

We were dealing with the lie about this supposed "confession" of
embezzelment. The timeframe of the missing trillions was fiscal year
1999 and 2000 which predates 9/11. Unlike you I will actually quote what
was said by Congresswoman McKinney:

"That's my first question. My second question, Mr. Secretary: according
to the Comptroller General of the United States, there are serious
financial management problems at the Pentagon, to which Mr. Cooper alluded.

"Fiscal Year 1999: $2.3 trillion missing.

"Fiscal Year 2000, $1.1 trillion missing."

You claim that the Bush "crime family" embezzeled this money and that
Rumsfeld confesses on video. George Bush became president in January
2001 and Rumsfeld became Secretary of State at that time as well. In
1999 and 2000, Bush was Governor of Texas and Rumsfeld was Chairman of
the Board of Gilead Sciences, Inc., a pharmaceutical company. That's an
awfully far stretch from the Pentagon to a governor and the chairman of
a pharmaceutical company.

Oh, and to be complete on the subject, here is the only statement by
Rumsfeld in regards to the missing trillions (which once again took
place before he ever took office):

"We, We will get back on both of the first two questions..."

Doesn't sound much like a "confession" to me.

I can only deal with one of your lies at a time.

The point of all of this was the fact that it was off-topic and did not
belong in this group. I'm not trying to change your opinions. You have
already proven that no amount of truth will change your mind and your
site shows that you will believe anything no matter how ludicrous as
long as it promotes your hatred of the man.

So please don't start dragging even more off-topic stuff into the group.
Let's stick with the single lie that you found important enough to
repeat hundreds of times in this group.