"HalcyonWild" wrote...
> "HalcyonWild" wrote...
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> // Bjorn A
Thanks Bjorn, I have the complete install of j2eeSdk, that one that is
over 100 MB. It states on the java site that jdk is bundled, but it
never stated explicitly, whether you need a separate j2sdk installation
or not. I had never tried j2eesdk and so I was not sure.
Normally, jboss/tomcat has the j2ee impl, but depends on an existing
j2sdk install, for running.
Also, I have seen different software carrying their own Jre, like
Oracle. So, I was wondering if Sun j2eesdk complete is carrying the
whole jdk or just the jre, something like oracle.
I have only the j2eesdk install now. No problems so far.
Bjorn Abelli - 12 Nov 2005 15:09 GMT
"HalcyonWild" wrote...
>> The "complete j2eesdk" install has the "jdk" bundled with it...
> So, I was wondering if Sun j2eesdk complete is carrying the
> whole jdk or just the jre, something like oracle.
To use your wording, the "complete j2eesdk" is "carrying the whole jdk",
although there are options at Sun's donload pages to download it as separate
bundles.
In most cases dealing with J2EE-implementations (such as JBoss), you
ususally already have a jdk installed, and never download any J2EE-libraries
from Sun, but instead makes use of those distributed with the actual
implementation (such as JBoss).
It was a long time ago since I installed any JBoss, so I don't remember what
the case was there.
Occasionally, some vendors bundle a jre to make sure that it will exist on
the target machine, to be able to run smoothlessly. Sometimes, it's even
crucial that it's a specific version of the jre, as the implementation
relies on "non-documented features" that might well have ceased to exist in
following versions (I beleive some Oracle applications does this).
// Bjorn A