> and are not available in 1.4. So, yes, if you want those features you
> have to update (to 1.5).

Signature
Everythinginlifeisrealative.Apingpongballseemssmalluntilsomeoneramsitupyournose.
> Peter MacMillan coughed up:
>>Generics (eg. Vector<Object>) are a feature of 1.5.0 (aka java 5.0)
>
> ICBW, but isn't it simply "java 5", with no revision? I think it's one of
> those marketing hoohah moments. Very confusing from the get-go. Like
> having "Java 2" with jdk revs in the 1's.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/relnotes/version-5.0.html
"Both version numbers "1.5.0" and "5.0" are used to identify this
release of the Java 2 Platform Standard Edition. Version "5.0" is the
product version, while "1.5.0" is the developer version. The number
"5.0" is used to better reflect the level of maturity, stability,
scalability and security of the J2SE."
Of course, the -source parameter to javac accepts 1.5 and 5.

Signature
Peter MacMillan
e-mail/msn: peter@writeopen.com
Thomas G. Marshall - 28 Apr 2005 03:59 GMT
Peter MacMillan coughed up:
>> Peter MacMillan coughed up:
>>> Generics (eg. Vector<Object>) are a feature of 1.5.0 (aka java 5.0)
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> "5.0" is used to better reflect the level of maturity, stability,
> scalability and security of the J2SE."
Thanks for the link. Clears it up a tad.
> Of course, the -source parameter to javac accepts 1.5 and 5.

Signature
Forgetthesong,I'dratherhavethefrontallobotomy...
Tor Iver Wilhelmsen - 28 Apr 2005 07:32 GMT
> "Both version numbers "1.5.0" and "5.0" are used to identify this
> release of the Java 2 Platform Standard Edition. Version "5.0" is the
> product version, while "1.5.0" is the developer version. The number
> "5.0" is used to better reflect the level of maturity, stability,
> scalability and security of the J2SE."
The really funny bit is if they do a "Solaris" next, and use 5.1 for
1.6.0.