> > I have a Socket class instance that I need to time out after a
> > specific amount of time:
>
> It isn't at all clear what you're trying to do. You create a Socket
> and a BufferedReader, but immediately close the BufferedReader which
> closes the Socket too (so there's no need for shutdown{In/Out}put).
I should have tried to make myself more clear. MailAdminReader is a
class that will connect to a remote mail server and retrieve someone's
mail. I am not allowed to update nor change anything in
MailAdminReader so I can do nothing about the fact that the class has
no ability to handle timeouts. If the remote mail server is not
available, MailAdminReader method checkUserMail() will keep trying for
minutes on end ad infinitum. What I am trying to do is to prevent
that from happening by figuring out a way to limit the time
checkUserMail() has to check remote mail while having no ability to
change MailAdminReader to do so.
Does that make more sense now?
> Further you can't set a property on one Socket instance and expect it
> to have any effect on another one used by your mailAdminReader,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> call in a separate thread, and wait at most 5 seconds for the thread
> to finish.
How would I do this within a JSP script?
> Or if you simply want to introduce a 5s delay in your code, try
> Thread.sleep().
>
> /gordon
>
> --
Gordon Beaton - 29 Feb 2008 14:58 GMT
> Does that make more sense now?
Perhaps. So you're trying to avoid invoking the MailAdminReader method
by testing first whether the machine is up?
Perhaps try something like this:
try {
Socket s = new Socket(); // note: unconnected
// choose the *same* port here as mailAdminReader uses! 25, 110, 143 etc
s.connect(new InetSocketAddress(addr, port), 5000);
s.close();
hasMail = mailAdminReader.checkMail();
}
catch (SocketTimeoutException) {
// no response
}
Or use a separate thread:
public class MyRunnable implements Runnable {
private boolean hasMail = false;
private boolean gotResponse = false;
public boolean gotResponse() {
return gotResponse;
}
public boolean hasMail() {
return hasMail;
}
public void run() {
try {
hasMail = mailAdminReader.checkMail();
gotResponse = true;
}
catch (Exception e) {
// no response
}
}
}
Then:
MyRunnable mr = new MyRunnable();
Thread t = new Thread(mr);
t.start();
t.join(5000);
if (mr.gotResponse()) {
hasMail = mr.hasMail();
}
> How would I do this within a JSP script?
Not knowing JSP, I'll hazard a guess and say the same way you'd do it
in an application.
Both of these techniques should work. The first one won't catch
situations where the mailAdminReader blocks for other reasons. The
second one will leave the thread dangling until the mailAdminReader
eventually times out, you just don't need to block waiting for that to
happen.
/gordon
--
phillip.s.powell@gmail.com - 29 Feb 2008 20:22 GMT
> > Does that make more sense now?
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> Not knowing JSP, I'll hazard a guess and say the same way you'd do it
> in an application.
I tried to use your example, however, I wound up with multiple
compilation errors due to variables not being declared "final", which
in JSP is beyond me to know how to do to variables instantiated within
a JSP scriptlet.
> Both of these techniques should work. The first one won't catch
> situations where the mailAdminReader blocks for other reasons. The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> --