It seems almost all programmers are man.
> It seems almost all programmers are man.
You are probably correct, well, not all, but from my experience (about
20 years) I would guess 90+% are men.
> It seems almost all programmers are man.
There are at least two (and another one, of whom I only
vaguely believe to remember a remark about her being female).
Each of them know a lot, and their level of helpfulness
and knowledge beats that of 99% of the men here, and
is probably equal-levelled with the remaining 1% (to
which I do not belong, btw).
Your analysis of pure quantity is not being refuted.
RedGrittyBrick - 10 Apr 2008 12:07 GMT
>> It seems almost all programmers are man.
The OP & the question seem somewhat trollish to me. This subject has
been discussed here a few months ago. There is already an uncomfortably
large amount of noise in c.l.j.p.
comp.lang.java.{help,programmer} - what they're for (mini-FAQ) says
comp.lang.java.programmer Programming in the Java language.
comp.lang.java.advocacy Arguments about X versus Y,
for various Java X and Y
Since X and Y are chromosomes, I suggest the latter forum as the least
off-topic :-)
Just my EUR 0.000000000000000002 worth.

Signature
RGB