I'm pretty sure that can't be right.  There isn't enough
computation involved.  *This* code however, has
enough computations to be right:

public class Foo {

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        int value;
        while ((value = aNumber()) != 54444);
        System.out.println(""+value);
        while ((value = aNumber()) != 54333);
        System.out.println(""+value);
        while ((value = aNumber()) != 54322);
        System.out.println(""+value);
        while ((value = aNumber()) != 54321);
        System.out.println(""+value);
        }

    public static int aNumber() {
        if (null == rand) rand = new java.util.Random();
        int result = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
            result = (10*result)+rand.nextInt(5)+1;
            }
        return result;
        }

    private static java.util.Random rand = null;
    }