> >Hi all,
> >I've a personal license for the IntelliJidea 7.0 IDEhttp://www.jetbrains.com/idea/
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> they use it. It is even more puzzling when they can have something
> comparable like Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans for nothing.
I think that is no more transferable only from the moment that you
activate it...
About the quality of the software i don't know very much about various
Java ide, each one have some pros and cons, imho i find intelliJ more
adapt for who has already some java skill and want to speedup
productivity, but maybe it lack some features that are usually
included (for example) in ide like Netbeans
Roedy Green - 19 Mar 2008 05:33 GMT
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT), Decagrog
<Decagrog@gmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who
said :
>I think that is no more transferable only from the moment that you
>activate it...
check with Ilia Dumov ilya.dumov at jetbrains.com
on how to handle the transfer and if it is possible.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
>It is even more puzzling when they can have something
>comparable like Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans for nothing.
I am a big fan of IntelliJ. The reasons why you might be willing to
fork out money include:
1. faster response.
2. constantly offers to improve your code. Just click to accept the
tidy.
3. the extremely configurable code formatter/rearranger satisfies the
anality of the average computer programmer.
4. it offers all kinds useful refactoring and lint.
5. There are people who are paid to answer your questions promptly and
politely. On the net you normally have to take a dose of sarcasm and
insult with your answer.
6. more intuitive interface.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
Roedy Green - 19 Mar 2008 06:50 GMT
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:30:37 GMT, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
>6. more intuitive interface.
7. very good about integrating changes you make inside IntelliJ
without outside. You don't really have to think. It just magically
works. I think it saves very frequently in the background.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
David Segall - 19 Mar 2008 16:25 GMT
>>It is even more puzzling when they can have something
>>comparable like Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans for nothing.
>
>I am a big fan of IntelliJ. The reasons why you might be willing to
>fork out money include:
I'm sure IntelliJ is a better IDE than its competitors in some
respects and I'm equally sure that one of Eclipse, NetBeans and
JDeveloper is "best" in others.
My post was intended to point out just how bad IntelliJ was in one
particular respect. I think the purchaser of _any_ product should be
entitled to sell it after they have finished with it.
You have a free copy of IntelliJ that allows you to develop free
software. If you write some commercial software the Open Source
License Agreement
<http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/opensource/license.html#openSource_licenseTerms>
would not allow you to use it. Would you (or have you) paid $249.00
for IntelliJ IDEA? To me, this mean spirited restriction on your use
of IntelliJ is another reason to reject the product.
Roedy Green - 20 Mar 2008 05:42 GMT
><http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/opensource/license.html#openSource_licenseTerms>
>would not allow you to use it. Would you (or have you) paid $249.00
>for IntelliJ IDEA? To me, this mean spirited restriction on your use
>of IntelliJ is another reason to reject the product.
If you are developing software commercially, you an afford a lot more
than $249 if it even marginally improves your productivity.
In any case, I don't think anyone can comment on its value without
having used it for a month or two.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
David Segall - 20 Mar 2008 14:48 GMT
>><http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/opensource/license.html#openSource_licenseTerms>
>>would not allow you to use it. Would you (or have you) paid $249.00
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>In any case, I don't think anyone can comment on its value without
>having used it for a month or two.
I agree with both those sentences but since you have used it for a
month or two I don't understand why you didn't answer my question. Do
you think that IntelliJ IDEA "improves your productivity" compared to
Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans?
Roedy Green - 21 Mar 2008 00:18 GMT
> Do
>you think that IntelliJ IDEA "improves your productivity" compared to
>Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans?
Yes. I explain why at http://mindprod.com/jgloss/intellij.html
The main reason is it responds to my commands more quickly.
The next most important reason is the lint, which catches all manner
of problems.
The next most important is the refactoring which saves all kinds of
keystrokes, and does it more accurately.
The emotional hook is the rearranger/reformatter which gives me far
better control of how my code is tidied than any tool I have used
before.
I suppose to be fair, I should revisit all the tools and give them
each time for my fingers to adjust, but there are not enough reasons
to want to leave IntelliJ, so I'm not willing to invest that time.
The one that most tempts me is Netbeans and its visual editor. I have
used visual editors since JDK 1.0 days, and have not been impressed,
though in theory I find them attractive.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
Arved Sandstrom - 24 Mar 2008 03:19 GMT
>>It is even more puzzling when they can have something
>>comparable like Eclipse, JDeveloper or NetBeans for nothing.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> 6. more intuitive interface.
I used IntelliJ on the job back in about 2002/03, and quite frankly back
then it was already an amazing Java IDE; there was nothing nearly as good.
I have no doubts that it has gotten better in the last 5 years or so.
Having said that, I currently use Eclipse and NetBeans both (Eclipse Europa
on Windows XP, NetBeans 6.0 on both Windows XP and Debian Linux) and I am
hard pressed to find lacking features (major ones) in either. IOW, I would
have been easily convinced to pay money for IDEA 5 years ago (and I
certainly have forked out cash for worthy tools before - I bought
Metrowerks CodeWarrior for Mac about a decade ago because it was a great
piece of gear), but I'd probably not do it now...Eclipse and NetBeans are
simply good enough, and you can't beat free.
AHS

Signature
* change 'two' to '2' to email me