>> no, the server should deal with it
>
> ok.. but.. why? :)
Because, err, that's what it's supposed to do. It has to close the
socket some time ...
> no, the server should deal with it
ok.. but.. why? :)
On 31 ÑÎ×, 04:17, "Crouchez" <safdfagf...@asdfagfsdfs.com> wrote:
> "adblock" <A.Gras...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> no, the server should deal with it
because the server deals with the sockets and keep-alive connections etc.
Lew - 31 Jan 2008 15:55 GMT
"adblock" <A.Grasoff@gmail.com> wrote...
>> no, the server should deal with it
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>> method ServletRequest.getInputStream() ?
>> no, the server should deal with it
adblock, your quoting style is hard to follow. Just trim the post to which
you are replying and insert your comments - no need to requote the quoted part
again.
> because the server deals with the sockets and keep-alive connections etc.
and so that the programmer doesn't have to. To flip your question about,
adblock, why would you NOT let the server close it for you?

Signature
Lew