Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Struts and XHTML strict doctype

Thread view: 
John - 13 Jan 2008 22:11 GMT
Hi all,
I have to create a front-end for our new intrAnet application. Since
it's completely new I've chosen to use Struts.

This are the restriction given by our Company:

JDK 1.4.2
J2EE 1.4
Struts 1.1
Browser compatibility: IE 6 + eventually IE 7
Productive platform OS: Solaris 10

Does any of you know if there is some incompatibility choosing to
develop the JSPs with Struts 1.1 and declaring the pages with XHTML
Strict Doctype?
If there is some incompatibility or maybe risk, which doctype would be
the better one?

Thank you very much for your hint guys,
John
Lew - 13 Jan 2008 23:51 GMT
> Hi all,
> I have to create a front-end for our new intrAnet application. Since
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> JDK 1.4.2

Java 1.4.2 already entered its End-of-Life process over a year ago, and will
be retired outright this summer - be aware.
<http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/index.jsp>

Besides, you miss out on all the lovely enhancements that came in with Java 5.

Even the not-current Java 5 is already three-plus years old.  Even that is due
to enter End-of-Life this summer if Sun follows its standard process.

> J2EE 1.4
> Struts 1.1

The current version of Struts 1.x is 1.3.  v1.1 is pretty far behind the front
edge.

> Browser compatibility: IE 6 + eventually IE 7
> Productive platform OS: Solaris 10
>
> Does any of you know if there is some incompatibility choosing to
> develop the JSPs with Struts 1.1 and declaring the pages with XHTML
> Strict Doctype?

There should be no trouble whatsoever, other than Struts 1.1 being itself an
old version.

> If there is some incompatibility or maybe risk, which doctype would be
> the better one?

Your problem will not be DOCTYPE but more likely using obsolescent, possibly
unpatched versions of software.  If you absolutely, positively must use Java
1.4.2, at least make sure you're patched through the latest version
sub-release to ensure you don't have security vulnerabilities.  (Update 16 is
the current sub-release.)

<http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/javase/security_adv/index.html>
> Sun Microsystems will start by releasing a set of security updates
> for the Java SE platform that include the following releases:
>     * JDK and JRE 6 Update 3
>     * JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 13
>     * SDK and JRE 1.4.2_16

Signature

Lew



Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.