Stefan Ram skrev:
>> I have a non binary tree and looking for a solution to find the path
>> between two given ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> If you find another common ancester by this, you even can take
> an abbreviation.
ITYM shortcut, not abbreviation.
Peter Mueller - 12 Jan 2008 18:22 GMT
> Stefan Ram skrev:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> ITYM shortcut, not abbreviation.
Hello Stefan,
I wrote a tree class realizing this method. Works fine for me.
Thank for the hint.
Peter
>>I have a non binary tree and looking for a solution to find the path
>>between two given ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
> Sometimes, there are /several/ paths between two points.
Not in a tree. Unless you allow going back and forth along the
same edge as part of a path (i.e., visiting the same node
twice), there is exactly one path between any two node.
> However, there will not be any path if the tree is empty.
Nor will there be any nodes, and since the question was on how
to find a path between two nodes, we know the tree isn't empty.
Apart from that, the solution is fine. Trace a path from each node
to the root. Then find the lowest node that is on both paths and
make a path from one node to that node, and from there to the other node.
If your tree keeps information about the depth of each node in the node,
then you won't have to trace the paths all the way to the root, but can
compare nodes at the same lavel until the paths meet.
/L

Signature
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lrn@hotpop.com
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'
Stefan Ram - 13 Jan 2008 02:25 GMT
>>Sometimes, there are /several/ paths between two points.
>Not in a tree. Unless you allow going back and forth along the
>same edge as part of a path (i.e., visiting the same node
>twice), there is exactly one path between any two node.
This indeed is allowed for a path - otherwise it would be a
called a »simple path«. (Sometimes »simple« might be omitted,
when it can be deduced from the context. This might have been
possible in the case of the OP.)
A tree, then can be /defined/ as a graph, where any two points
can be connected by a unique /simple path/.
Stefan Ram - 13 Jan 2008 02:36 GMT
Supersedes: <path-20080113032202@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
>>Sometimes, there are /several/ paths between two points.
>Not in a tree. Unless you allow going back and forth along the
>same edge as part of a path (i.e., visiting the same node
>twice), there is exactly one path between any two node.
This indeed is allowed for a path - otherwise it would be a
called a »simple path«. (Sometimes »simple« might be omitted,
when it can be deduced from the context. This might have been
possible in the case of the OP.)
A tree, then can be /defined/ as an undirected simple graph,
where any two points can be connected by a unique /simple path/.