
Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.physci.org/
> Please repeat the (crux of the) subject line within the body
> of posts. *
ok, the following code doesn´t work in some browser/VM combinations:
this.showStatus("some string");
>>does not work when used with IE7 and Sun´s JRE
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> bottom, and provides an AppletContext that passes on the
> messages.
er... if the browser was in full screen mode no one would know if this
method was working or not, agree?
so it´s pretty obvious that it´s not working when the browser HAS a status
line/panel...
> (** AFAIR all earlier J2SE versions will say much the
> same thing).
>
>>works with IE6 and Sun´s JRE
>
> Lucky.
and why did both MS and Sun put this method on their VMs if it´s not
supposed to work?
>>works with IE7 and MS VM
>
> Lucky? Where did you get an MSVM, and what on earth
> possessed you to infect your IE7 with it?
as a registered Java developer Microsoft granted me the rights to distribute
their VM... and MS VM is still stable, 10x faster than Sun´s and there´s no
annoying auto updates...
>>any clues?
>
> * Also, please capitalize the first letter of each sentence.
Lew - 11 Jan 2008 01:01 GMT
> as a registered Java developer Microsoft granted me the rights to distribute
> their VM... and MS VM is still stable, 10x faster than Sun�s and there�s no
> annoying auto updates...
Nor useful manual ones. You also don't get concurrency libraries, NIO,
generics, for-each, enum, HotSpot, security patches, ...
I don't get "annoying" or any other kinds of automatic updates to Java if I
don't want to, and I use Sun's (and IBM's, but that's not important now). So
I don't understand that as a benefit to using an out-of-date, incompatible
version of "Java".
Then there's this little nugget right from Microsoft themselves:
<http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/java/default.mspx>
> The MSJVM will reach its end of life on December 31, 2007.
Obviously this is old news now in 2008.
> Customers are encouraged to take proactive measures to stay informed about
> obsolete software and move away from the MSJVM in a timely fashion.
> The MSJVM is no longer available for distribution from Microsoft and there
> will be no enhancements to the MSJVM.
> Microsoft products and SKUs currently including the MSJVM will continue to
> be retired or replaced by versions not containing the MSJVM.
Good luck with all that.

Signature
Lew
Andrew Thompson - 11 Jan 2008 01:11 GMT
...
>as a registered Java developer Microsoft granted me the rights to distribute
>their VM...
Really? Given they are not distributing it off their own site,
and had the crap sued out of them for supplying it themselves,
I find it hard to believe they (recently) felt thay had the right
to 'authorize' anyone else to distribute it.
>...and MS VM is still stable, ..
Yes. Those security bugs in the 3810 build will bever be fixed.
>..10x faster than Sun´s ..
Not at doing anything 'post 1.1'. ;-)
Besides - 10X? I saw some results that suggested the
MSVM was around 4-5x faster at raw int calculations,
but have lost the URL of the applet. Care to put up an
URL for testing? (I too, have access to an MSVM -
though MS sure did not authorize it).
>..and there´s no
>annoying auto updates...
The auto-update is configurable. It would be best to advise
users to keep it enabled so they get the latest *security*
updates, but concede it can be pretty irritating for
developers.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.physci.org/