>Andrew, could you ask your question more specific?
I felt Michael's questions were fairly specific, but ultimatety,
"code* answers a thousand questions".
* Specifically, code that is an SSCCE.
>...Then I will be able
>to answer it, and maybe you could help us out here.
What did you *not* understand about Michael's questions?
Note there is only so much 'guesswork' that people are prepared
to do on your behalf - the rest needs to be filled in
(stated/written/explained), specifically, by you.
Have you *read* the SSCCE document yet? If there was anything
in it that was incomprehensible (gobble-de-gook, nonsense, ..) I
would like to be told that (since I created the document, and it is
intended to help programmers).

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.physci.org/