> ..
>
> >The code that I propose at the end of the post should read an image
> >and display it in an applet, refreshing it each time it is loaded.
>
> No. That code was a waste of bandwidth.
> ..
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> of the code.
> <http://www.physci.org/codes/sscce.html>
>> ..
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Sigh this code has been set up by the software programmer that
>provided me this applet, ..
Any Java programmer worth paying, would not have produced
such rubbish. Truly, there were many aspects in the code
that made me think you were a keen learner who had gotten
out of their depth. A 'keen learner' can make such (and so
many) mistakes without too many repercussions, but
somebody who is supplying code for others, should
know better.
>...as you unserstood I'm not at all a Java programmer.
I do now - I didn't then. We get many learners here, few
of them would have been able to state the problem as
clearly as you did.
...
>> ...This applet requires no extended permissions.
>
>I set up this policy while trying to load and use the applet from
>appletviewer on my PC (it returned an error)
My (altered) version loaded the image successfully, from
a path relative to the codebase - no 'extended permissions'
required.
...
>> <http://www.physci.org/codes/sscce.html>
>
>You are right but I thought it was not too kind to send the whole
>code, I was hoping the problem could be found in the runWork method
..dump that code. Honestly, it is rubbish. It would be
quicker to write* again from scratch, than fix the many
problems with it.
* And if that means hiring a new programmer - so be it.
Whoever gave you that code does not deserve feeding,
let alone paying.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.physci.org/
Giox - 03 Dec 2007 16:49 GMT
> >> ..
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> somebody who is supplying code for others, should
> know better.
To be honest, this code sample has been provided in a example by Texas
Instruments, I hoped that it was ok, but now I think they used a "low"
cost programmer
> >...as you unserstood I'm not at all a Java programmer.
>
> I do now - I didn't then. We get many learners here, few
> of them would have been able to state the problem as
> clearly as you did.
> ..
Thanks :-), I devoted last weekend to read some old University
book :-)
> >> ...This applet requires no extended permissions.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> a path relative to the codebase - no 'extended permissions'
> required.
I will try to code a new applet following the ideas that you provided
me
> ..
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Whoever gave you that code does not deserve feeding,
> let alone paying.
Sigh I will try to contact TI.
Or better I will try to code it by my self
Thanks again for your help
> --
> Andrew Thompsonhttp://www.physci.org/
>
> Message posted via JavaKB.comhttp://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200712/1