>Hello friends,
We are not your friends.
>Please excuse me if I'm writing this message right here,
No, because..
>..but as I'm a
>fan member of this Usenet,
..if you a) understood usenet, or b) were a 'fan', you might
take a little more time *reading* it and realise that spam
such as your tripe is not welcome here (there, or indeed
anywhere).
So, not only are you a multi-posting spammer, but you are
also a lier, and/or a pillock.
>..I thought maybe I can give back some useful
>resources ..
You have nothing of use, to anyone.
Now p*ss off.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Hooman - 19 Nov 2007 00:52 GMT
Thanks for review! Opinions are respected, but rarely your language.
Good luck,
Hoom
http://www.javaforce.com/
> >Hello friends,
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Message posted via JavaKB.comhttp://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200711/1
Andrew Thompson - 19 Nov 2007 03:48 GMT
Please refrain from top-posting. Another thing you might have
noticed about these groups you are supposedly a 'fan' of, is
that top-posting is generally disliked.
>Thanks for review!
You are welcome. You can expect something similar for
any more posts you make, along those lines.
>..Opinions are respected, but rarely your language.
'Rarely'? Are you now claiming to be expert enough about
*my* use of language to determine how often I swear at
people who post here (that is rare) as opposed to me
swearing at lying/pillock multi-posting spammers, like
you (that is common-place)?
Of course, the very fact you would monitor your own post
and frame a reply to my objections, indicates you have at
least a little more sense than your average spammer. So
I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
and be encouraged to cease and desist making further
posts like that.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Hooman - 19 Nov 2007 06:13 GMT
> Please refrain from top-posting. Another thing you might have
> noticed about these groups you are supposedly a 'fan' of, is
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> and be encouraged to cease and desist making further
> posts like that.
Thanks for notice Andrew, I just *realized* that ;)
> --
> Andrew Thompsonhttp://www.athompson.info/andrew/
>
> Message posted via JavaKB.comhttp://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200711/1
--
Hooman Taherinia
http://www.javaforce.com/
Dag Sunde - 19 Nov 2007 22:39 GMT
<snipped/>
>> I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
>> and be encouraged to cease and desist making further
>> posts like that.
>
> Thanks for notice Andrew, I just *realized* that ;)
You do *realise* that that there is a lot of *coulourful*
differences between British English and American English?

Signature
Dag.
Hooman - 20 Nov 2007 08:44 GMT
> <snipped/>
> >> I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> Dag.
For sure, and I *realise* THAT THAT there is *COULOURFUL* mistakes and
misunderstandings right here! :)
--
Hooman Taherinia
http://www.javaforce.com/
Dag Sunde - 20 Nov 2007 17:33 GMT
>> <snipped/>
>> >> I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> For sure, and I *realise* THAT THAT there is *COULOURFUL* mistakes and
> misunderstandings right here! :)
LOL!

Signature
Dag.
Lew - 21 Nov 2007 01:48 GMT
>>> <snipped/>
>>> >> I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> LOL!
Isn't there some Usenet law that grammatical corrections (such as the
attempted "*realized*" are followed almost immediately by a grammatical
mistake from the corrector (failure to match subject and verb number in the
followup post)?

Signature
Lew