...
>Also, people who are annoyed by ..

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
> ..
>>Also, people who are annoyed by ..
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> * Of their web based email. Alter actions slightly, for
> email clients.
Hello,
This is an intranet web app for employees of a company. Yes, its very much
like annoying spam concept with a banner-like and domain cookie tracking
but the senior managers would like to know how many (and who?).
This will not be unleashed outside of the company.
Yes, text email clients would not records squat, that's viewed as a
"limitation" of this design.
HTML email content must go to a server to process elements inside of it but
every <img ...> tag would eventually get proxied and thus, it seems like I
need to run some AJAX in there or something.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Rob
Andrew Thompson - 17 Nov 2007 14:17 GMT
>> ..
>>>Also, people who are annoyed by ..
Intrusive employers?
...
>This is an intranet web app for employees of a company. ...
So why not 'cut the crap' and install keystroke monitors
on the machines connected to this intranet?
Or is that illegal (even with specific work contracts allowing
it, by employee signature) where you are?
<shudder>I feel dirty</shudder>
An entirely different and less intrusive approach might be..
>...Yes, its very much
>like annoying spam concept with a banner-like and domain cookie tracking
>but the senior managers would like to know how many (and who?).
Ever tried..
1) A poll on the company's homesite?
I take it the browsers are 'locked in' to opening at a specific
page? Put a prominent "Did you care enough to read the
e-letter?" Yes/No form on that page - maybe even pop a
dialog using JS/'onload'.
2) A simple poll 'rating' at the end of the email itself.
Obviously you will not get replies from people who did
not read it, nor even everyone that *did,* but at least it
gives some idea of 'penetration'. And as a bonus, those
who do respond tell you how much they liked/hated or
found it informative/uninformative or ..
Knowing information like that, is vastly more useful than
discovering the resource usage of some (damnable) GIF!

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/