> Swing offers:
> - AbsoluteLayout
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> -Ramon
No

Signature
Knute Johnson
email s/nospam/knute/
>Swing offers:
> - AbsoluteLayout
Not in J2SE 6.0.*
> - FlowLayout
AWT
> - BorderLayout
AWT
> - GridLayout
AWT
> - CardLayout
AWT
> - GridBagLayout
AWT
> - BoxLayout
Yep.
> - SpringLayout
Yep.
> - FormLayout
Not in J2SE 6.0.*
* I suspect these are NetBeans specific layouts.
>While SWT offers:
> - AbsoluteLayout
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Shouldn't both lists be identical?
Dunno'. Why should they be? Can't J2SE layouts be used
in SWT? If so, that only leaves the layouts that Swing does not
provide, or that SWT thinks it can do better.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Wayne - 10 Nov 2007 06:17 GMT
>> Swing offers:
>> - AbsoluteLayout
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> in SWT? If so, that only leaves the layouts that Swing does not
> provide, or that SWT thinks it can do better.
A good way to see the dozen or so layouts available to swing/awt is
to check the "known implementing classes" for java.awt.LayoutManager
and LayoutManager2. There are many special use layouts, but anyone
can use them!
-Wayne
Andrew Thompson - 10 Nov 2007 07:24 GMT
..
>...There are many special use layouts, but anyone
>can use them!
<tongue in cheek>
That's a big claim, given some people can f*ck up
use of FlowLayout.
</tongue in cheek>

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/