> I am using reflection to getmethod(methodName, Class parameters) and
> invoke(object, obj[] parameters) methods from some Objects.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> (Note that the object is not always an instance of String[]... it
> could be an instance of SomeOtherClass[])
RTFM:
[ From Class.newInstance(): ]
Throws:
[ ... ]
InstantiationException - if this Class represents an abstract
class, an interface, an array class, a primitive type, or void; or if
the class has no nullary constructor; or if the instantiation fails for
some other reason.
[ ... ]
Arrays cannot be created with a new instance, because they are a
special-case class.
> My question is:
>
> Does the "[L" at the beginning and the ";" at the end have a meaning?
Yes, this is the internal representation of the class (it means that
this is an array of java.lang.String's).
> How can I solve this problem?
What you are probable intending is something like this:
Method m = Class.forName("some.pkg.Type").getMethod("main",
String[].class);
m.invoke(null, new String[0]);
> I am using IntelliJ 6.0.5.
Java version matters, not IDE version.

Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Joshua Cranmer - 30 Oct 2007 22:56 GMT
> What you are probable intending is something like this:
>
> Method m = Class.forName("some.pkg.Type").getMethod("main",
> String[].class);
> m.invoke(null, new String[0]);
If the type of array must be determined at runtime, the following idiom
can also be used:
// arrayType is a class representing the type we want.
Object array = Array.newInstance(arrayType, 0); // Empty array
Array has another overloaded version that handles multiple array dimensions.

Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Z - 30 Oct 2007 23:53 GMT
Thanks for the clarifications. I hope that my phrasing of the question
shows where I am stuck.
What I am intending to do is:
//here is how my program is flowing
String className = namesOfAllClasses[j]; //I have it coming through a
loop
Class class1 = Class.forName(className);
Fields fields = class1.getDeclaredFields(); //assuming that all fields
are Class type (not primitive)
for (int i=0; i < fields.length; i++) {
Class newClass = Class.forName(fields[i].getType().getName()); //
create a class of the field type
Object newObject = newClass.newInstance(); //create an object of
the new field type
Method m = newClass.getMethod(methodName, newClass); /*get method;
we can assume it's "set"+fields[i].getName()*/
Object arguments[] = {"dummy"};
m.invoke(newObject, arguments);
}
/*
When a field is someClass[], I am facing troubles since now the
fields[i].getType().getName() = L[some.pkg.name.someClass;
In this case:
Class newClass = Class.forName(fields[i].getType().getName()) is
returning with a result (no exceptions)
But using the newInstance is generating exceptions since it's a
special-case class as you explained.
You have used
m.invoke(null, new String[0]); //it gave me back a
nullPointerRxception even though it's a static method
My problem is that the second parameter in invoke does not have to be
a String type for the parameter object but is an object instance of
the L[some.pkg.name.someClass; (object array)
Example: This method looks like this in ClassName.java
public void setsomeObjectProperty(some.pkg.name.someClass[]
someObjectProperty) {
this.someObjectProperty= someObjectProperty;
}
Any tips?
*/
Thanks again for your time
> > I am using reflection to getmethod(methodName, Class parameters) and
> > invoke(object, obj[] parameters) methods from some Objects.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Daniel Pitts - 31 Oct 2007 02:04 GMT
>>> I am using reflection to getmethod(methodName, Class parameters) and
>>> invoke(object, obj[] parameters) methods from some Objects.
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
>
>
First, please don't top-post. Reply after the bottom or interleaved.
Second, Don't look for set+name or get+name methods. Use the
introspection API. (java.beans.*). There is more to JavaBeans than just
a naming convention.
Also, ask yourself if you REALLY need to use reflection/introspection at
all. I wrote an article about it on my blog sometime last year
<http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
I'll post the exact link when I have a chance to look it up.

Signature
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
> I am using reflection to getmethod(methodName, Class parameters) and
> invoke(object, obj[] parameters) methods from some Objects.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Object someObject= (Object) String[].class.newInstance();
That fails, because the array class does not have a normal
constructor. Here you try to invoke a default constructor.
> (Note that the object is not always an instance of String[]... it
> could be an instance of SomeOtherClass[])
>
> I do get the following exception:
> java.lang.InstantiationException: [Ljava.lang.String;
> My question is:
>
> Does the "[L" at the beginning and the ";" at the end have a meaning?
Yes. Java writes the name of and array of object type as "[L" followed
by the name of the class and ended by ";". I.e., the type
my.foo.Foo[]
has the name "[Lmy.foo.Foo;". Arrays of base types have other abbreviations,
e.g., "[I" for int[].
> How can I solve this problem?
Array.newInstance(String.class, 0); // equivalent to: new String[0]
/L

Signature
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lrn@hotpop.com
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'