Java Forum / General / October 2007
Static imports in JSP pages
Kenneth P. Turvey - 30 Oct 2007 18:03 GMT I've been writing a web application for a client. It isn't a large affair, but it is important to the client. In so doing I've used static imports on some of my pages. It just makes the JSP code look a bit cleaner. The import I've used looks like:
<%@ page import="static com.my.domain.MyClass.*" %>
This works fine under TomCat so I assumed it was supported by the standard. Unfortunately when I try to run the same code under Resin, I have no success.
So, the question is, "Are static imports supported by the JSP standard?" and, "If they are how does one do them in a portable manner?"
Is Resin broken?
Thanks.
I've been posting a number of questions recently. I apologize for the extra bandwidth I've been using. Normally I spend more time answering questions than asking them, but lately I've run into any number of issues.
I'll try to even out the Karma balance over the next few months.
Thanks again.
 Signature Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-usenet@squeakydolphin.com>
Manish Pandit - 30 Oct 2007 18:56 GMT On Oct 30, 10:03 am, "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kt- use...@squeakydolphin.com> wrote:
> I've been writing a web application for a client. It isn't a large > affair, but it is important to the client. In so doing I've used static [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > -- > Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-use...@squeakydolphin.com> AFAIK, regulat imports are supported and are a part of the spec (as the @page directive). Do you have to use static imports? I believe they just improve the readability and have no impact on performance/ runtime.
-cheers, Manish
Lew - 31 Oct 2007 00:40 GMT > On Oct 30, 10:03 am, "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kt- > use...@squeakydolphin.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > they just improve the readability and have no impact on performance/ > runtime. Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't be any scriptlet in the JSP.
 Signature Lew
Kenneth P. Turvey - 31 Oct 2007 01:03 GMT > Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't be > any scriptlet in the JSP. Would you explain yourself here. I'm not sure I understand.
I've got very little code in the JSP at all, just a few method calls. They are generating HTML to go in the page.
I could have used tag libraries, but they seemed like overkill at this point. I am unlikely to be reusing the code.
 Signature Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-usenet@squeakydolphin.com>
Lew - 31 Oct 2007 01:15 GMT >> Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't be >> any scriptlet in the JSP. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I could have used tag libraries, but they seemed like overkill at this > point. I am unlikely to be reusing the code. As a general rule, and of course there are exceptions, JSPs should contain only markup and custom tags, not direct scriptlet. Non-JSP servlets and regular classes contain all the direct Java code.
Code in the JSP always makes trouble, to the point where I separate it out even for small projects.
But your response shows that you know this already. I suspect I am not answering your question, because I can't see that I'm telling you anything that you don't already know.
 Signature Lew
Daniel Pitts - 31 Oct 2007 02:13 GMT >>> Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there >>> shouldn't be any scriptlet in the JSP. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > answering your question, because I can't see that I'm telling you > anything that you don't already know. If he's going to create the HTML in Java (which seems silly since JSP was designed for that), then he is probably better off creating it in the servlet (or in Spring MVC terms, the Controller), and then passing that into the JSP as part of the model/request attribute.
 Signature Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
Lew - 31 Oct 2007 05:30 GMT > If he's going to create the HTML in Java (which seems silly since JSP > was designed for that), then he is probably better off creating it in > the servlet (or in Spring MVC terms, the Controller), and then passing > that into the JSP as part of the model/request attribute. Yes, you are absolutely correct. I felt that introducing a conditional expression within EL at this point might be overwhelming.
<input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicYes" ${logic3=="yes"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> Yes <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicNo" ${logic3=="no"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> No <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicWha" ${logic3=="wha"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> Wha <br />
untested
 Signature Lew
Lew - 31 Oct 2007 05:41 GMT > If he's going to create the HTML in Java (which seems silly since JSP > was designed for that), then he is probably better off creating it in > the servlet (or in Spring MVC terms, the Controller), and then passing > that into the JSP as part of the model/request attribute. I just canceled a message that based part of its background on a whole other thread. I made a suggestion to someone recently where they wanted a radio button preselected based on a previous post. It used an attribute such as "hasYes" which is set either to "checked=\"checked\"" or "". The corresponding radio button substituted an Expression Language (EL) construct for that attribute:
<input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicYes" ${hasYes} /> Yes <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicNo" ${hasNo} /> No <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicWha" ${hasWha} /> Wha
If I remember EL syntax correctly, you can use a conditional expression:
<input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicYes" ${logic3=="yes"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> Yes <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicNo" ${logic3=="no"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> No <br /> <input type="radio" name="logic3" id="logicWha" ${logic3=="wha"? "checked='checked'" : ""} /> Wha
Untested. You might have to prefix the 'logic3' request variable with an implicit scope. I still look up the details whenever I use EL.
I deliberately left off making the radio prompts into <label>s this time.
 Signature Lew
Almond - 31 Oct 2007 06:20 GMT >> If he's going to create the HTML in Java (which seems silly since JSP >> was designed for that), then he is probably better off creating it in [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > >I deliberately left off making the radio prompts into <label>s this time. Time to pay da bills, you arrogant sucker, who has enough arrogance to pronounce the death sentences to all those, who give a dead flying chicken wether you are alive or dead.
Git it?
 Signature The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of. NewsMaestro v. 4.0.5 - Way Too Cool has been released.
Automatic enablement of all buttons, checkboxes and fields depending on operation. Templates generator improvements.
Job list improvements for new installations having no jobs to begin with.
In some previous releases some class files were missing. As a result, the program would not run. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Multi-job support and other important feature additions and various improvements and optimizations.
Web page: http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/
Download page: http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm
Send any feedback to newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru. Your personal info will not be released and your privacy will be honored.
Daniel Pitts - 31 Oct 2007 07:17 GMT *plonk*
> Git it?
 Signature Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
Almond - 31 Oct 2007 06:18 GMT >>> Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't be >>> any scriptlet in the JSP. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >But your response shows that you know this already. I suspect I am not >answering your question, because Because you are not here to answere ANY kwestions. Because you think you are the highest priest around, all knowing.
Right?
Seig hail!
>I can't see that I'm telling you anything >that you don't already know. Then why are you saying all this crap?
 Signature The most powerful Usenet tool you have ever heard of. NewsMaestro v. 4.0.5 - Way Too Cool has been released.
Automatic enablement of all buttons, checkboxes and fields depending on operation. Templates generator improvements.
Job list improvements for new installations having no jobs to begin with.
In some previous releases some class files were missing. As a result, the program would not run. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Multi-job support and other important feature additions and various improvements and optimizations.
Web page: http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/
Download page: http://newsmaestro.sourceforge.net/Download_Information.htm
Send any feedback to newsmaestroinfo \at/ mail.ru. Your personal info will not be released and your privacy will be honored.
Are Nybakk - 31 Oct 2007 12:33 GMT >>>> Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't be >>>> any scriptlet in the JSP. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Then why are you saying all this crap? Pardon me for butting in, but this thread has already been tainted. It is really not professional to come with such a comment. Such behavior ruin an otherwise fantastic forum for both newcomers and professionals. I am a freshman to these java-groups, but already I get the impression that Lew is a very competent java programmer that share's his view on many subjects. If you don't like his answers you are free to look the other way. I'd say, however, it's a good idea to listen to all opinions no matter what you think of who's posting it. To throw nasty comments on someone like you do is simply not acceptable behavior.
To compare Lew, or anyone else, to something that's got to do with Nazism is just silly. That's nothing anyone here could take seriously. On a side note, you didn't even manage to write one of two words in proper German.
Lew - 31 Oct 2007 13:54 GMT > Pardon me for butting in, but this thread has already been tainted. It > is really not professional to come with such a comment. I recommend that you killfile trolls, Are.
Thank you for the kind words.
I don't remember the reference, but in flame wars there is a natural law that they devolve to Nazi comparisons.
I don't know what Almond said, but based on your and Daniel Pitts's responses it must not have been nice.
As to Almond, feel free to comment all you want. It's a public forum. Be as rude as you like; you're invisible anyway.
I did see one remark, thanks to Are's quote. As a matter of fact, I am the highest priest around, but I'm only all-knowing when I'm speaking /ex cathedra/. Blessings on you, Almond, and may the Goddess open your eyes and your heart, and especially may She grant you full knowledge of your heart and of your place in this universe. /Benedicte/.
 Signature Lew
Daniel Pitts - 31 Oct 2007 02:10 GMT >> On Oct 30, 10:03 am, "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kt- >> use...@squeakydolphin.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Really he shouldn't have any imports in the JSP, because there shouldn't > be any scriptlet in the JSP. Took the words right out of my "mouth".
 Signature Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
Andrew Thompson - 31 Oct 2007 05:39 GMT ...
>Took the words right out of my "mouth". <speculative> Snatched the letters right from beneath my fingers? </speculative>
Nah.. doesn't quite have the same "ring" to it. ;-)
 Signature Andrew Thompson http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Daniel Pitts - 31 Oct 2007 07:15 GMT > ... >> Took the words right out of my "mouth". [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nah.. doesn't quite have the same "ring" to it. ;-) Actually, my fingers have a ring to it. Same with my wife's :-)
 Signature Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
|
|