> Hello, i'm new to java programming and i'm need some tips. First of
> all i had downloaded and installed the jdk1.6.0_03 and installed also
> JCreator Pro, but i need to user the javax.swing library.... where can
> i download that library? is the jdk1.6.0_03 the correct stuff to
> create swing applications or should i get the J2SE 1.4.2_13?

Signature
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Wahoo! Indians beat New York to advance to the AL Championship Series!
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-al9oct09,1,5871580.story
> > Hello, i'm new to java programming and i'm need some tips. First of
> > all i had downloaded and installed the jdk1.6.0_03 and installed also
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Wahoo! Indians beat New York to advance to the AL Championship Series!http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-al9oct09,1,5871580.story
Much thnx for the answer, actually i was getting some compile error
because i was doing an "import java.swing", not "import javax.swing".
I know it a lame error but since I'm a total newb on java, some things
are not so obvious to me :)
Steve Sobol - 17 Oct 2007 23:57 GMT
> Much thnx for the answer, actually i was getting some compile error
> because i was doing an "import java.swing", not "import javax.swing".
> I know it a lame error but since I'm a total newb on java, some things
> are not so obvious to me :)
Acid,
Yeah, we all had to start somewhere; no worries! You should check out
docjar.com; it's a great resource even for those of us who've done Java
programming for years.

Signature
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Wahoo! Indians beat New York to advance to the AL Championship Series!
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-al9oct09,1,5871580.story
Lew - 18 Oct 2007 00:20 GMT
alarcon.rodrigo@gmail.com wrote:
> is [sic] the jdk1.6.0_03 the correct stuff to
> create swing [sic] applications or should i [sic] get the J2SE 1.4.2_13?
Gosh, don't download 1.4, it's in its End-of-Life phase. Java 6 is the
current version; don't waste your time with an obsolescent version.
Have you read the verbiage on the Java web site about what the JDK is versus
what the JRE is?

Signature
Lew
Andrew Thompson - 18 Oct 2007 01:40 GMT
>alarcon.rodrigo@gmail.com wrote:
>> is [sic] the jdk1.6.0_03 the correct stuff to
>> create swing [sic] applications or should i [sic] get the J2SE 1.4.2_13?
>
>Gosh, don't download 1.4, it's in its End-of-Life phase. Java 6 is the
>current version; don't waste your time with an obsolescent version.
Further to that, JDK 1.4 can develop apps suitable
for Java with a minimum version of 1.1 -> 1.4.
JDK 1.6 can develop apps suitable for Java with a
minimum version of 1.1 -> 1.6.
If you want to use generics or beyond, use the latest JDK
(and if you don't - no drama).

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Mark Space - 18 Oct 2007 03:57 GMT
> Much thnx for the answer, actually i was getting some compile error
> because i was doing an "import java.swing", not "import javax.swing".
> I know it a lame error but since I'm a total newb on java, some things
> are not so obvious to me :)
This is surprising. A good idea will tell you that "import java.swing"
isn't found before you compile. And it will add the correct import for
you, and remove ones that you aren't using.
Dump that lame JCreator and get NetBeans.
Andrew Thompson - 18 Oct 2007 04:16 GMT
>> Much thnx for the answer, actually i was getting some compile error
>> because i was doing an "import java.swing", not "import javax.swing".
>> I know it a lame error but since I'm a total newb on java, some things
>> are not so obvious to me :)
>
>This is surprising. A good idea..
IDE? A good IDE is perhaps a good idea, but
they are not the same thing!
>.. will tell you that "import java.swing"
>isn't found before you compile. And it will add the correct import for
>you, and remove ones that you aren't using.
>
>Dump that lame JCreator and get NetBeans.
As I see it, only 2 things are really needed to fix
the problem.
- Understanding the compiler error, and (possibly)
- Access to the JavaDocs.
[ Though I would expect a good IDE to hook the
JavaDocs 'directly into' the debug messages/code. ]

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Mark Space - 18 Oct 2007 18:41 GMT
>> This is surprising. A good idea..
>
> IDE? A good IDE is perhaps a good idea, but
> they are not the same thing!
Yeah not sure what happened there. I did mean IDE. Maybe the spelling
checker got me...