
Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
>> http://mindprod.com/project/chequebookbalancer.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>hard enough, whereas colour looks better) Except for the 's' v. 'z'
>differences: it sounds like a 'z' so it, IMHO, should be spelled like a 'z'.
I agree, »color« looks terribly wrong.
Roedy Green - 04 Oct 2007 02:16 GMT
>I agree, »color« looks terribly wrong.
To me it looks bleached and sterile. It conjures up the impoverished
palette of colours available for decorating corn flakes boxes. But
there is nothing inherent in either spelling. It is your associations
and what you are used to.
It is like kosy vs cosy.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:59:45 GMT, Joshua Cranmer
<Pidgeot18@verizon.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who
said :
> (color looks wrong if you look at it
>hard enough, whereas colour looks better) Except for the 's' v. 'z'
>differences: it sounds like a 'z' so it, IMHO, should be spelled like a 'z'.
Daniel Webster, and other early Americans, wanted to simplify and
rationalise spelling. So they took the u out of colour and honour.
They changed French derivative words ending in re to er.
Further they changed pronunciation to make it easier for the
immigrants. The insisted you pronounce every syllable, unlike the
clipt vowels of the British upper class. It was seen as a
democratisation of language.
I like to avoid American spelling, except when enforced by Java or
required for consistency in Java programs, both as a badge of my
nationality and a tiny resistance of the American domination
economically, politically and militarily of the planet. It is a
crass, overly commercial, self-centred, planet-destroying culture. It
is what happens when you make capitalism the state religion.
Gore Vidal remarked that he was so happy to be born at this time in
history with a front row seat to watch the collapse of civilisation.
It was like getting to observe the fall of Rome.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
Tim Slattery - 04 Oct 2007 14:03 GMT
>On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:59:45 GMT, Joshua Cranmer
><Pidgeot18@verizon.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Daniel Webster, and other early Americans, wanted to simplify and
>rationalise spelling.
Wrong Webster, I believe. Daniel was a 19 century politician. The
lexicographer was Noah Webster (1758-1843). His dictionary did indeed
standardize the spelling of English words in America.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah_Webster

Signature
Tim Slattery
Slattery_T@bls.gov
http://members.cox.net/slatteryt
John W. Kennedy - 05 Oct 2007 01:58 GMT
> Wrong Webster, I believe. Daniel was a 19 century politician. The
> lexicographer was Noah Webster (1758-1843). His dictionary did indeed
> standardize the spelling of English words in America.
His was also the best-selling dictionary in Britain at the time work
started on the NED (later known as the OED).

Signature
John W. Kennedy
"...when you're trying to build a house of cards, the last thing you
should do is blow hard and wave your hands like a madman."
-- Rupert Goodwins
bbound@gmail.com - 06 Oct 2007 07:55 GMT
On Oct 3, 9:13 pm, Roedy Green <see_webs...@mindprod.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Gore Vidal remarked that he was so happy to be born at this time in
Error, line 54: undefined symbol "Gore Vidal"
(And who on earth spells anything as "kosy"???)
Lew - 06 Oct 2007 14:47 GMT
> On Oct 3, 9:13 pm, Roedy Green <see_webs...@mindprod.com.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> (And who on earth spells anything as "kosy"???)
You haven't heard of Gore Vidal? Damn.
And who on earth needs more than one question mark for a question????????
Have you heard of Wikipedia?? Do you have the energy to use it????
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gore_Vidal>
That would've taken you less time than posting your snarky remarky.
Right????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Signature
Lew
bbound@gmail.com - 08 Oct 2007 05:19 GMT
> That would've taken you less time than posting your snarky remarky.
But it would have failed to communicate to the OP the fact that their
message had failed to be self-explanatory without requiring people go
look stuff up. :)
Lew - 08 Oct 2007 05:31 GMT
>> That would've taken you less time than posting your snarky remarky.
>
> But it would have failed to communicate to the OP the fact that their
> message had failed to be self-explanatory without requiring people go
> look stuff up. :)
Some people are not so lazy as not to look things up.
Gore Vidal is very famous.

Signature
Lew
nebulous99@gmail.com - 08 Oct 2007 06:20 GMT
> bbo...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> That would've taken you less time than posting your snarky remarky.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Some people are not so lazy as not to look things up.
How do you know I didn't look it up, but ask anyway just to make the
point that the name isn't a household one everyone is sure to
recognize?
> Gore Vidal is very famous.
Not famous enough for me to have recognized the name, obviously.