>For a while now I have been calling blogspot.com "blogspot.spam" because of
>all the nasty spammers who use it for their plagiarized, poorly-written crap
>that they try to sucker us newsgroupies into. Others have told me not to
>blame blogspot just because it makes mid-nineteenth century Colorado look like
>a bastion of lawfulness.
...
>OK, corral my preconceptions and toss'em out. blogspot is abused, but I guess
>not to blame.
In regard to the spammers, do you make use of the 'Flag'?
<http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42517>
Does it cause the material to disappear quickly?
(I am a little skeptical their 'Flag' would be effective
for plagiarists or spammers - it did not seem to
allow any inclusion of comment as to what was
objectionable.)

Signature
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/
Lew - 23 Sep 2007 19:19 GMT
Lew wrote:
>> OK, corral my preconceptions and toss'em out. blogspot is abused, but I guess
>> not to blame.
> In regard to the spammers, do you make use of the 'Flag'?
> <http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42517>
The "flag" requires that one have navigated to the spammer's page in order to
flag it. I don't usually bother to visit these spammers' pages, except to
identify if they are plagiarizing and to so report to the group if they are.
I don't bother doing even that if the spam is obviously commercial, but for
the "interview questions" and "Java ebooks" and like spammers I sometimes do.

Signature
Lew