Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help! to solve this question

Thread view: 
argszero - 11 Sep 2007 10:48 GMT
http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mininterval?hl=en
Andrew Thompson - 11 Sep 2007 11:40 GMT
>http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mininterval?hl=en

Please don't bring conversations from these 'toy' Google
Groups over to usenet.

Signature

Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Roedy Green - 11 Sep 2007 13:21 GMT
>http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mininterval?hl=en

Why do people bother making up so many artificial problems where the
answer does not matter when there are so many real world problems to
solve? This is a general question. It is a deeply rooted feature of
humanity. Is it just they admit tidy solutions with minimal work?

And why do you want us to work on it?

1. to publicise the web site.

2. so you can submit the solution as yours?

3. because you think we need the exercise?
Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

Wildemar Wildenburger - 11 Sep 2007 17:04 GMT
> Why do people bother making up so many artificial problems where the
> answer does not matter when there are so many real world problems to
> solve? This is a general question. It is a deeply rooted feature of
> humanity.

Right you are. But you make it sound like games are a bad thing.

> Is it just they admit tidy solutions with minimal work?

I don't get that sentence.

/W
christopher@dailycrossword.com - 12 Sep 2007 00:37 GMT
On Sep 11, 9:04 am, Wildemar Wildenburger
<lasses_w...@klapptsowieso.net> wrote:
> > Why do people bother making up so many artificial problems where the
> > answer does not matter when there are so many real world problems to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> /W

substitute "allow for" for "admit"
Roedy Green - 12 Sep 2007 02:42 GMT
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:04:32 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
<lasses_weil@klapptsowieso.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>Right you are. But you make it sound like games are a bad thing.
>
>> Is it just they admit tidy solutions with minimal work?
>>
>I don't get that sentence.

My mother was highly opposed to games and athletics.  Everything in
her view needed a practical purpose.  I picked up that attitude. Why
do people waste time on puzzles?

You do the work without any benefit.

So why would you? because you get a charge out of solving a problem.
Artificial problems are artificially tidy and easy so you get a big
bang for a small amount of work.

Real world problems rarely have quick or tidy solutions. They are full
of compromises.
Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

~kurt - 12 Sep 2007 03:33 GMT
> My mother was highly opposed to games and athletics.  Everything in
> her view needed a practical purpose.  I picked up that attitude. Why
> do people waste time on puzzles?

Athletics are not without a purpose - not everyone sits behind a desk
every day all day.  Even the average person benefits from the coordination
gained from being forced to play sports when going to school.  Games also
teach people skills.  Small skills can build forming a foundation for the
big problems.

Quite often, impractical problems are what give reason for one to get out
of bed in the morning.  Most people hate their jobs, and only have time
for something small on the side.  It is hard to find a job that works
on the real problems.

- Kurt
Lew - 12 Sep 2007 03:40 GMT
>> My mother was highly opposed to games and athletics.  Everything in
>> her view needed a practical purpose.  I picked up that attitude. Why
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> for something small on the side.  It is hard to find a job that works
> on the real problems.

Solving "toy" problems is like lifting lighter weights - it builds your mental
muscles without straining them too hard whilst you're learning.

Signature

Lew

Roedy Green - 12 Sep 2007 08:22 GMT
>Solving "toy" problems is like lifting lighter weights - it builds your mental
>muscles without straining them too hard whilst you're learning.

I found that in teaching kids, artificial problems put them off unless
it was very clear it was a stepping stone to their stated goal.

Think of all the silly artificial arithmetic problems you solved in
school.  All they did in most cases was convince the students they
would never need arithmetic or algebra once the exam was done.
Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

~kurt - 13 Sep 2007 03:53 GMT
> I found that in teaching kids, artificial problems put them off unless
> it was very clear it was a stepping stone to their stated goal.

Putting them off is irrelevant - you need to learn the basics, and the
kids just need the discipline to do it.  That is why they are not given
a choice about studying before they understand why they need to study it.
The most efficient way to get the material across is to teach it, and
filling the lessons with fluff does nothing more than hold those with
the aptitude for it back.  About the only real world problem that a kid
in grade school is going to be able to do with arithmetic is balance a
checkbook.

Word problems - the most hated by students - attempt to put the math
to use.  But those are typically artificial problems too.

I can't think of any real problems that you are going to be able to
present to kids learning algebra who are just learning how to factor
polynomials.  The most insight you can give them is that they are going
through this trouble to eventually find the roots of the equation, and
at the most you can plot the equation and show them what this means.
But, without physics, what is the use of that?  What about complex numbers?
Just what real world problem will a high school junior be able to work on
in which complex numbers are needed?

> Think of all the silly artificial arithmetic problems you solved in
> school.  All they did in most cases was convince the students they
> would never need arithmetic or algebra once the exam was done.

Maybe the stupid kids.  All the "silly artificial arithmetic problems"
I worked as a kid formed the foundation for the mathematics I do on a
daily basis.  I knew I was going to be an engineer, so I paid attention
and learned.

I'm disgusted with the programs I see in place now.  I would love for
someone to explain to me why it is necessary to have certain software
on your computer, or a special graphics calculator, to learn arithmetic,
algebra, geomoetry, calculus, etc....  I can't believe they waste time
teaching students how to use such software.  They do it because they
believe it will make it more interesting for the kids.  But, it takes
up valuable time that should be spent on mathematics - once again it
all comes down to holding back the gifted for the sake of the average.

- Kurt
Roedy Green - 12 Sep 2007 08:19 GMT
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:33:45 -0000, ~kurt
<actinouranium@earthlink.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>Athletics are not without a purpose - not everyone sits behind a desk
>every day all day

In my mother's view exercise is necessary, but it should be combined
with a practical purpose, e.g. gardening, transportation or housework.

There is just so much to be done, you can't fritter your energy on
treadmills.
Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

~kurt - 13 Sep 2007 03:58 GMT
> In my mother's view exercise is necessary, but it should be combined
> with a practical purpose, e.g. gardening, transportation or housework.

Well, the problem with that view is such work does not put your muscles
through a full range of motion, so they tend to atrophy.  And, they do
not stress the skeletal system enough to maintain bone density.  You
can see the difference between active old people, and active old people
who work out - it is like night and day.

- Kurt
Wildemar Wildenburger - 13 Sep 2007 12:03 GMT
> In my mother's view exercise is necessary, but it should be combined
> with a practical purpose, e.g. gardening, transportation or housework.

By no means is this going to be an offense (you have to be really
carefull about that around here), but what are you doing for fun?

/W
Wildemar Wildenburger - 13 Sep 2007 14:31 GMT
>> In my mother's view exercise is necessary, but it should be combined
>> with a practical purpose, e.g. gardening, transportation or housework.
>>
> By no means is this going to be an offense (you have to be really
> carefull about that around here), but what are you doing for fun?

We Germans just don't get the tenses right, do we?
Make that: What do you do for fun?

Sorry.
/W
Roedy Green - 14 Sep 2007 12:46 GMT
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:31:33 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
<lasses_weil@klapptsowieso.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>We Germans just don't get the tenses right, do we?
>Make that: What do you do for fun?

My health is so bad, I have very little energy.

Things you might would not think of:
- a hot bath
- an effervescent drink with ground up fruit.
- going to the store for a bagel
- watching First Wave on TV.
- word play and discussions about topics no one else thinks about with
my roommate.
- reading about technology I will likely never use.
- answering easy newbie questions.
Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

Roedy Green - 14 Sep 2007 12:41 GMT
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:03:16 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
<lasses_weil@klapptsowieso.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>but what are you doing for fun
She was not a Christian, but would get quite angry when she heard
people "having fun".  It doubt it was really a philosophical complaint
with frivolity, just that  it made her envious. She was a bit of a
slave driver, and was only happy when she had all her 5 kids
industriously working away on activities that would increase her
social status.

There is a line in Mary Poppins  --  "fraught with purpose". I like
all my activities "fraught with purpose".  Something inside prods that
my activities all must be directed to some grand end.  Even though you
can see the source of your mental programming, that does not escape
you from it.  Adulthood is a great series of disillusionments about my
own importance in the universe.

Signature

Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com

Lew - 14 Sep 2007 13:31 GMT
> Adulthood is a great series of disillusionments about my
> own importance in the universe.

You have trememdous importance in the universe, Roedy.

Signature

Lew

argszero - 12 Sep 2007 01:28 GMT
On Sep 11, 8:21 pm, Roedy Green <see_webs...@mindprod.com.invalid>
wrote:

> >http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mini...
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
> The Java Glossaryhttp://mindprod.com

Just want to know if there is a solution.Thanks.
Hunter Gratzner - 12 Sep 2007 08:46 GMT
> Just want to know if there is a solution.Thanks.

Sure ... So you don't have to do your own homework? This is a
discussion group, not a helpdesk. You didn't manage to motivate people
here to look into your artificial problem, and demanding a solution
will not help. Trying to deter people to a vanity group didn't help
you either.
Andrew Thompson - 12 Sep 2007 08:56 GMT
..
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mini...
...
>Just want to know if there is a solution.Thanks.

I just want a pony.  But I would not come here looking
for it, this is a Java discussion forum.  

A Java discussion forum is probably also the wrong
place to come if you require spoon-fed answers, as
your posts seem to suggest.  For that, see a
help-desk or consultant.

If on the other hand, you want to begin to *discuss*
the problem (perhaps by stating your idea of the
answer, as well as your reasoning and any code
that supports the reasoning, then ask others to
*discuss* your conclusions and reasoning) that
might* be more effective at kicking this thread off
to a good start.

* 'Might' being the operative word.  There are no
guarantees on usenet, and people do not usually
discuss threads that started on other groups.
And that brings me to.. Do you really think the
creator of that forum would want *you* to be talking
about that problem here?  I have no real care about
their group, but at just 2** members, it seems it hardly
needs one of the two members ducking off to other
groups for answers.

** It currently shows '3' because I joined it, about
to chew out the creator for promoting his group on
usenet, but since you (apparently) did *not* create
that group, I decided to leave that poor sucker be.

Signature

Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

RedGrittyBrick - 12 Sep 2007 19:53 GMT
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/java-code-challenge/web/calculate-mini...
>>
>> And why do you want us to work on it?
>
> Just want to know if there is a solution.

Yes, there is a solution.


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.