JAVA was once a very modern language but I feel it is loosing it's
importance because of Microsoft Monopoly. Why do Microsoft not give
enough support for Java.
We see Flash works better than Applets and faster, While even little
Applet takes lot of time to download. Why Browsers do not support
Applet as par as Flash.
Any animation in Flash looks 10 times better than done in Java. Why
are OS not making Java applets work as fast and clear as Flash
animations? I do not think it is technically infeasible.
I feel it is due to Microsoft's strategy to weaken Java use. As Java
is much better than "C++" and quite simpler than learning C. You are
get rid of Pointers, Linked lists etc. Which I do not understand what
is use of them other than to crash your system. Java is much safe to
use.
Bye
Sanny
usenetuser@hotmail.co.uk - 20 Jul 2007 09:53 GMT
> JAVA was once a very modern language but I feel it is loosing it's
> importance because of Microsoft Monopoly. Why do Microsoft not give
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Applet takes lot of time to download. Why Browsers do not support
> Applet as par as Flash.
Perhaps that is more of a judgement of the programmer of the Java
animations you have seen, rather than the Flash animations.
> Any animation in Flash looks 10 times better than done in Java. Why
> are OS not making Java applets work as fast and clear as Flash
> animations? I do not think it is technically infeasible.
It is up to the JVM writer (Sun, etc) to make Java as fast and
efficient as possible on a particular target OS -- it isn't up to the
OS programmer.
> I feel it is due to Microsoft's strategy to weaken Java use. As Java
> is much better than "C++" and quite simpler than learning C. You are
> get rid of Pointers, Linked lists etc. Which I do not understand what
> is use of them other than to crash your system. Java is much safe to
> use.
Have you tried Java animation applets on Linux? Are they still worse
than Flash? Blame MS where it is due, but MS is no more/less "in bed"
with Adobe (Flash) than it is with Sun.
> Bye
> Sanny
Roedy Green - 20 Jul 2007 10:29 GMT
>Any animation in Flash looks 10 times better than done in Java. Why
>are OS not making Java applets work as fast and clear as Flash
>animations? I do not think it is technically infeasible.
here is a feature for fast animation called VolatileImage
see
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/awt/image/VolatileImage.html
also
http://mindprod.com/jgloss/image.html
the idea is you put predigested images inside the hardware regen
buffer of the video card, then shuffle them around with the video
graphics processor.
The coding is tricky, but the results are speedy since they use the
specialised gaming processor.

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
Roedy Green - 20 Jul 2007 10:43 GMT
>Any animation in Flash looks 10 times better than done in Java. Why
>are OS not making Java applets work as fast and clear as Flash
>animations? I do not think it is technically infeasible.
see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/regen.html

Signature
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
Sanny - 20 Jul 2007 13:28 GMT
> >Any animation in Flash looks 10 times better than done in Java. Why
> >are OS not making Java applets work as fast and clear as Flash
> >animations? I do not think it is technically infeasible.
>
> seehttp://mindprod.com/jgloss/regen.html
> --
It was Very difficult to understand.
I have a spirit which moves from point a (x1,y1) to b (x2,y2) . I use
duble buffering. How will I use virtual Image technique.
Bye
Sanny