I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
1.6.0_02-b05.
I'm trying to replicate what I think is a compiler bug in a very specific
version of the JDK.
- Oliver
Mr. N. Marshall - 13 Jul 2007 23:48 GMT
> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
> 1.6.0_02-b05.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> - Oliver
http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=21687

Signature
N. Marshall
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those that know binary
Those that do not know binary
Steven Simpson - 14 Jul 2007 13:04 GMT
> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
> 1.6.0_02-b05.
>
I downloaded jdk-6u2-linux-i586.bin from the usual place on Wednesday,
and it reports as "1.6.0_02-b05".
<http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp>
Just downloaded it again to check, and md5sum reports identical hashes.

Signature
ss at comp dot lancs dot ac dot uk |
Lew - 14 Jul 2007 15:05 GMT
Oliver Wong wrote:
>> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
>> 1.6.0_02-b05.
> I downloaded jdk-6u2-linux-i586.bin from the usual place on Wednesday,
> and it reports as "1.6.0_02-b05".
>
> <http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp>
>
> Just downloaded it again to check, and md5sum reports identical hashes.
I just got jdk-6u2-linux-amd64.bin yesterday and it also is build 1.6.0_02-b05.

Signature
Lew
ndcosta - 16 Jul 2007 06:40 GMT
> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
> 1.6.0_02-b05.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> - Oliver
Hi Oliver,
1.6.0_02-b05 has been updated on the Sun's site to 1.6.0_02-b06. Could
you let me know what the compiler bug is and I could test it too.
Thanks,
Nelson
Oliver Wong - 16 Jul 2007 16:12 GMT
>> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
>> 1.6.0_02-b05.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 1.6.0_02-b05 has been updated on the Sun's site to 1.6.0_02-b06. Could
> you let me know what the compiler bug is and I could test it too.
The thread describing the bug is at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fc
bf38747fb260c3/567c88a5e3bced31
but I'm afraid may not be enough details there yet for you to try and
reproduce it.
- Oliver
Piotr Kobzda - 17 Jul 2007 16:17 GMT
>>> I managed to find 1.6.0_02-b06 and 1.6.0_01-b06 on Sun's site, but not
>>> 1.6.0_02-b05.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> but I'm afraid may not be enough details there yet for you to try and
> reproduce it.
I've just posted there an example which allows to reproduce it (at least
on my machine) using different JVM versions, including the recent one.
Unfortunately, I don't have 1.6.0_02-b05 to compare the results, and I
don't really know how to get such specific version from Sun. The latest
available build for Windows (jdk-6u2-windows-i586-p.exe) is version
1.6.0_02-b06 (downloaded Today).
If you wish to test it with older versions, you can get them there:
http://java.sun.com/products/archive/
piotr