> Thanks for all the replies
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> believe no one using my app would find much in MS file explorer or
> even 'wash-whiter' clones that's worth using.
I find MS Explorer to be indispensable to Windows use. Similarly, I find the
graphical file explorer(s) in Gnome or KDE to be indispensable. Luckily, they
come with the OS at no extra cost.
> And yes, hopefully compatible with as many platforms as possible in
> the long run, but core target is Windows base
Where people already get Explorer for free.
> I'm providing detailed concept and looking for one or a few
> programmers to code it. I'm bringing network, market knowledge and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the skeptical side of things, yet believe that this concept has great
> potential.
You'd need to convince me. I would happily code such a thing for enough cash,
but I wouldn't want any shares. I already have plenty of Kleenex(r).
> That's for the details, let me know what else you want to know.
How much would such a product cost? Why in the world would anyone want it?
Even if it were free (retail)?

Signature
Lew
GregNetwork@gmail.com - 13 Jun 2007 04:47 GMT
Lew, you're right, there is a risk users would not shift to my
product.
And there is a chance they would. Why? Well, sorry, can't tell you
more about product features just yet.
I'm sorry if that part wasn't clear, but I am NOT looking for business
advice here. I'm really looking for 1) general information on the
programming side of a program that looks like MSFE 2) potential
contacts I could explore in the programming world for enthusiastic
people who would accept share and cash arrangement after discussing
the concept OFFLINE. So I guess I'll go ahead and take you off the
list of interested programmers
Lew - 13 Jun 2007 11:25 GMT
> Lew, you're right, there is a risk users would not shift to my
> product.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the concept OFFLINE. So I guess I'll go ahead and take you off the
> list of interested programmers
Oh, break my heart. But I am not trying to provide business advice, I was
asking questions about your idea because I was interested. Your response
certainly killed that.
Oh, well, I guess I'll take you off my list of people who are seriously trying
to share an idea.

Signature
Lew
Daniel Dyer - 13 Jun 2007 09:35 GMT
>> Thanks for all the replies
>> I'm not really looking to create a clone of MS explorer, but
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Where people already get Explorer for free.
...
> How much would such a product cost? Why in the world would anyone want
> it? Even if it were free (retail)?
There is at least one company (seemingly) making money from this kind of
product, on the Mac at least (but maybe there's more of a market there
because the default OS X "Finder" is, IMO, not very good):
http://www.cocoatech.com/pf4/
Dan.

Signature
Daniel Dyer
http://www.uncommons.org
Lew - 13 Jun 2007 11:31 GMT
GregNetwork@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I'm not really looking to create a clone of MS explorer, but
>>> something
>>> that would replace it entirely. Could be superimposed initially, but
>>> I
>>> believe no one using my app would find much in MS file explorer or
>>> even 'wash-whiter' clones that's worth using.
Lew wrote:
>> How much would such a product cost? Why in the world would anyone
>> want it? Even if it were free (retail)?
> There is at least one company (seemingly) making money from this kind of
> product, on the Mac at least (but maybe there's more of a market there
> because the default OS X "Finder" is, IMO, not very good):
>
> http://www.cocoatech.com/pf4/
Thank you for your thoughtful and relevant response, something the OP should
consider.
I see a lot of such products in the PC space, too, going by names like
"commander" and whatnot. In that world the free tools seem to win.
In the Mac world, do you see a market for another similar product?

Signature
Lew