
Signature
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
> I'm currently writing a set of closely related programs which all run
> against a fairly simple RDBMS schema. There's little or no overlap
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> this is similar to the way large classes such as StringBuffer are
> structured in the JDK class library.
I would go for a common base class and specific classes. If your
programs develop over time, then it should make code reuse easier.
Arne
Martin Gregorie - 04 Jul 2007 17:16 GMT
>> I'm currently writing a set of closely related programs which all run
>> against a fairly simple RDBMS schema. There's little or no overlap
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> I would go for a common base class and specific classes. If your
> programs develop over time, then it should make code reuse easier.
Thanks, Arne.
This has sat on the ng for quite a while without getting any answers. In
the meantime I restructured my initial code as a (fairly minimal) base
class and a set of program-specific extensions after deciding that there
was less commonality than I originally thought.
Thanks for confirming that this is a sensible approach.

Signature
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |