> Hi,
G'day. Please note that starting a post's
subject line with words in '['/']' will cause
them to be hidden in the the GG groups list.
I suggest not to do that, so everyone can see
the entire subject line.
> I have a class called Device that instantiates another class DbMoney
> in this manner:
..
> return new DbMoney( money, hardware.getName() );
..
> Object() in java.lang.Object cannot be applied to (my.IMoney,
> java.lang.String)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Q) My arguments to the DbMoney constructor match that of its declared
> method parameters.
Do they? Your code snippets do not support
that, or more accurately, if we had an SSCCE*,
we could confirm that for ourselves.
>..So that can't be the problem. What am I doing
> wrong ?
I am not sure, but if you supply an
SSCCE of your current code, that shows
the same compilation error, I might be
able to assist further.
* For more info. on the SSCCE, see..
<http://www.physci.org/codes/sscce.html>
Andrew T.
Chris Uppal - 28 Mar 2007 06:54 GMT
> G'day. Please note that starting a post's
> subject line with words in '['/']' will cause
> them to be hidden in the the GG groups list.
> I suggest not to do that, so everyone can see
> the entire subject line.
Or better yet. Ignore the entire issue, and whatever way GG happens to be
broken today. Stick to well-established Usenet conventions. If GG can't get
its act together then so much the worse for Google, its users, and its
advertising income.
I.e. bugger Google.
-- chris
> Object() in java.lang.Object cannot be applied to (my.IMoney,
> java.lang.String)
> return new DbMoney( money, hardware.getName() )
> ^
Andrew's advice to reduce this to an SCCCCE is good, you should follow it.
But, just as a guess, it sounds as if my.DbMoney has no constructors -- have
you inadvertently turned your would-be constructor into a normal method by
giving it a return type ?
-- chris