Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

$40,000 dollars in your PayPal account

Thread view: 
free - 25 Mar 2007 19:48 GMT
AS SEEN ON OPRAH! $40K IN YOUR PAYPAL ACCOUNT! (this really does
work)

That's Right $40,000 dollars in your PayPal account and that's NO
BULL!

AND IT WAS PROVEN ON OPRAH, NATIONAL TV & IT'S COMPLETELY LEGAL!

$10 Dollars!...That's all it cost!

To get started copy this whole page and paste it in an e-mail to edit

it. Simply follow the instructions below and in 2 to 3 weeks, you
will

have at least $40,000 dollars in your PayPal account. Most people

respond to this program because of the low investment and high profit

potential. There is no limit to the income you can generate from this

because you can do it over and over.

With a business PayPal account you can accept credit cards

If you follow the instructions, you will reach thousands of people!

Honesty, Faith, and Integrity make this system work. I think everyone

has heard of "PayPal". Anyone with an e-mail address can join for
FREE!

so if you're not already a PayPal user, the first thing you need to do
is

sign up. Either click the paypal link below or open another window
and

copy the following link into the address bar, then hit enter and join

PayPal.

https://www.paypal.com/it/mrb/pal=ENG8UWMWE7SNN

TEAM WORK MAKES THIS DREAM WORK!

Send $10.00 dollars to the first person on the

list. Then email that person saying "Thanks I've joined. Please add
me

to your list".

Remove the 1st email address from the list and move each address up
to

the next position. Then, add your email address in the 5th position.

This is a key factor to the success of this program, IMMEDIATE RETURN

ON YOUR INVESTMENT! When just one person joins you get back your $10

investment! Everything after that is PURE PROFIT!

This payment method rewards the first person for putting their time

into marketing this opportunity and it ensures that the newest
addition

to the list will work just as hard! Teamwork at its Finest!

Here is the list:

1. iancummings205@hotmail.com

2. taddeifulvio1977@yahoo.com

3. ciucamarian@hotmail.com

4.  john01968@aol.com

5. annbrown1985@yahoo.com

FOLLOW THESE DIRECTIONS (BELOW) FOR SENDING YOUR $10 BY

PayPal TO THE PERSON AT THE TOP OF THE LIST OF FIVE EMAILS

(1) Login to YOUR PayPal account and click on the 'Send Money' tab;

(2) In the 'Recipient's Email' field, enter the FIRST email address

from the top of the list of 5 emails.

(3) In the 'Amount' field, enter 10 (this is your $10 payment).

(4) In the 'Type' field, select "Service" (though it doesn't really

matter what you put here,this is for paypals own records.)

(5) VERY, VERY IMPORTANT: In the 'Note' field on the PayPal form,

type "ADD ME TO YOUR LIST"

(Be certain to add that notation, as this is what keeps the program

legal).

This procedure

must be accurate because you are showing that you have just purchased
a

service from the

person with the PayPal email address at the top of the list.

(6) Finally, click on the Continue button to complete the payment.

Next send out this letter until you get at least 20 "Thanks I've

joined" emails. The fifth person is the monitor of this list! When
your

name is in the 1st slot, 8,000 to 15,000 people will send you 10

dollars!

you get out of life what you put into it...and what goes around comes

around. That describes this opportunity in a nutshell!

DO NOT TRY TO PUT YOURSELF IN FIFTH PLACE WITHOUT PAYING, AS PAYPAL

WILL AUTOMATICALLY NOTICE THIS AND DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT AND POSSIBLY

PURSUE LEGAL ACTION , SINCE THIS IS A LEGITIMATE PROGRAM, AND THEY
ARE

PART OF IT!

TESTIMONIALS:

Mary Gatters, Columbus, SC: I only have one thing to say to you... OH

MY GOD! I sent out 142 copies total before 20 replied, like the

instructions said. Then I went on a short vacation. When I got back
my

account

had over $32,000 dollars in it already and the money was still
coming!

I'm still floating on air (especially with my new car). I thought the

'guardian' system sounded cheesy, but now I realize it is the formula

that makes this letter really work! THANKS!

I know that you have seen this on Oprah, 20/20 or read about it in
the

Wall Street Journal. You have probably received junk mail and
currently

receive emails about this simple program, but just delete them. I
know

I have! But this time I decided to give it a try. With the internet
you

can speed this message around the world!, and it's only a $10.00

investment!

Please give it an honest effort, you will not be disappointed and
will

be very glad you did when it starts to work. Remember, all you're
going

to be out of pocket is about the cost of a couple of coffees with the

opportunity of banking thousands of dollars into your PayPal account!

Wishing you Success & Prosperity!

Go to any search engine (Yahoo, Google, etc.) and search phrases like

"millionaire message board" or "money making message board" or

"opportunity message boards. better yet get yourself a email blaster.

that way you can reach millons!! that means much more profits for
you!!!
Andrew Thompson - 26 Mar 2007 00:25 GMT
> AS SEEN ..

..spamming across many posts.

P*ss off.

Andrew T.
Andreas Leitgeb - 26 Mar 2007 11:53 GMT
>> AS SEEN ..
> ..spamming across many posts.
> P*ss off.
> Andrew T.

I thought you only meant to answer on the non-obvious spams...
Andrew Thompson - 26 Mar 2007 12:12 GMT
On Mar 26, 8:53 pm, Andreas Leitgeb <a...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
wrote:
> >> AS SEEN ..
> > ..spamming across many posts.
> > P*ss off.
> > Andrew T.
>
> I thought you only meant to answer on the non-obvious spams...

Umm.. no.  I make a point of making at least
one post on 'a' thread of any poster that I
report for abuse*.

In this instance, since this moron was also
reposting, I limited the reply to just one of
it's thread's.

* My (vague) point in doing this is to justify
to whomever might care to read/act upon the
abuse report, that the OP had also been accused,
in public, of being a spammer, and well gee if
they made no reply at all, that in itself
supports (in some small way) my accusation..

If, on the other hand, the accused *is* reading
(as was the case recently) and decides to respond,
then perhaps we can sort what is, and is not,
acceptable on the groups, they can learn how
to 'push their point' without further aggravating
the situation, and I can get on with tech. posts.

Andrew T.
Wojtek - 26 Mar 2007 14:50 GMT
Andrew Thompson wrote :
> Umm.. no.  I make a point of making at least
> one post on 'a' thread of any poster that I
> report for abuse*.

And you do it quite well :-))

I have a news reader (MesNews) which has a Group Statistics function.
And the top 10 posters are:
------------------------------------
Group : comp.lang.java.programmer
Computing time : 00:00:48
Statistics : from 1991.02.05 to 2007.02.25

***** Users with most messages *****
num| Name                         | Nb Msg | size      | or. | %
----|------------------------------|--------|-----------|-----|--------|
 1 | Andrew Thompson              |  1,639 | 3,379,954 |  54 |  7.22%

 2 | Lew                          |  1,255 | 3,175,382 |   8 |  5.53%

 3 | Daniel Pitts                 |    816 | 2,204,630 |   7 |  3.60%

 4 | Chris Uppal                  |    711 | 1,743,885 |   4 |  3.13%

 5 | Oliver Wong                  |    676 | 1,992,466 |   2 |  2.98%

 6 | Arne Vajhøj                  |    630 | 1,306,424 |   1 |  2.78%

 7 | John Ersatznom               |    440 | 1,190,139 |  12 |  1.94%

 8 | Alex Hunsley                 |    419 |   909,061 |   5 |  1.85%

 9 | Patricia Shanahan            |    383 |   965,316 |   6 |  1.69%

10 | Twisted                      |    343 | 1,501,901 |   4 |  1.51%

------------------------------------

Disclaimer: Nothing is implied by posting this statistic. It is for
your personal amusement only.

Signature

Wojtek :-)

Andrew Thompson - 26 Mar 2007 17:24 GMT
> Andrew Thompson wrote :
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I have a news reader (MesNews) which has a Group Statistics function.
> And the top 10 posters are:
...
>  num| Name                         | Nb Msg | size      | or. | %
...
> Disclaimer: Nothing is implied by posting this statistic. It is for
> your personal amusement only.

'We *are* amused' (said with 'royal' accent..)

Statisics taken with 'huge grain of salt'*, but
you've got me curious now.  What does the 'or.'
column represent?

* For those of you unfamiliar with the expression
'take it with a grain of salt' it means basically
'do not entirely believe it - but, yes I heard you'.

Andrew T.
Wojtek - 26 Mar 2007 19:05 GMT
Andrew Thompson wrote :
>> Andrew Thompson wrote :
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> you've got me curious now.  What does the 'or.'
> column represent?

I think it means the originator of a thread.  There is a further
statistics grouping which sorts according to thread originator and it
uses the same abbrevation.

The author is German and some of the translation is, well, interesting.

Signature

Wojtek :-)

Lew - 26 Mar 2007 22:56 GMT
> Andrew Thompson wrote :
>>> Andrew Thompson wrote :
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> The author is German and some of the translation is, well, interesting.

How did I get so high up the list when I've only been posting to
clj.programmer since a few months ago?

Me and my big mouth! :-)

-- Lew
Andreas Leitgeb - 27 Mar 2007 07:53 GMT
> How did I get so high up the list when I've only been posting to
> clj.programmer since a few months ago?

By posting twice :-)    (at least this time)
Andreas Leitgeb - 27 Mar 2007 08:05 GMT
>> I thought you only meant to answer on the non-obvious spams...
>
> Umm.. no.  I make a point of making at least
> one post on 'a' thread of any poster that I
> report for abuse*.

I mean this is unnecessary for the real *obvious*
spam (such as this thread's origin).

I also think to remember that you once wrote yourself
you'd concentrate on the less obvious spams (where a
spammer e.g. pretends some java-context or "job-offerings"
posted to all *.java.* groups he might have found)

For f'up-ing on those, I, too, really thank you;
For the obvious spam-threads it's (imho) better
to just report and otherwise ignore them.

> If, on the other hand, the accused *is* reading
> (as was the case recently) and decides to respond,
Spammers like the current thread's one, never do that.
And no abuse-report processor will expect any type of
attempted feedback to the spammer in those cases.


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.