 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Java Forum / General / March 2007AGLOCO- this worries Google
Hi, AGLOCO- this worries Google Bill Gates thinks Google should be worried! ------------------------------------------- You must have heard by now about Agloco and how many people think it is going to be bigger than Google... Now Bill Gates is on record saying they have a great business model and that Google should be worried. Google search result produce - 1,400,000 web pages for Agloco. Google makes billions of $$$ and keeps it all for itself... Agloco one day is going to also make billions of $$$ except it will be completely shared out to its members! You make money with Agloco by using your computer as you would normally! Plus Agloco has a great referral pakage! So start building your network! Join AGLOCO - Own the Internet! click on this... www.agloco.com/r/BBCD7223 It's all over the blogosphere and Bill Gates has been quoted as saying he believes it "will be the next big thing to hit the internet", so what is Agloco and will they really pay you for surfing the net? I too was sceptical when I heard about it but after spending a few hours googling and reading about it, I have not only come round to the idea but am now thinking it could really work and could really make us (that's me and all of you who are reading this) some money. regards, Ketan Arora www.agloco.com/r/BBCD7223 On Mar 24, 7:38 pm, "ketanar...@gmail.com" <ketanar...@gmail.com> wrote: Sub: AG-SPAMO this worries Google 4 things. a) I think not, but.. b) I don't care either way. c) You are a multi-posting spammer d) P*ss off. Andrew T. > Sub: AG-SPAMO this worries Google > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > c) You are a multi-posting spammer > d) P*ss off. Andrew, I've got to commend you in your relentless fight against spammers in this newsgroup. :) Joe >> Sub: AG-SPAMO this worries Google >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I've got to commend you in your relentless fight against spammers in > this newsgroup. :) Too bad the multi-posting spammers a) don't read the responses, and b) don't p*ss off. But it sure is fun to excoriate them in absentia. -- Lew "Joe Attardi" <jattardi@gmail.com> wrote in news:1174737929.364803.34770 @n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: >> Sub: AG-SPAMO this worries Google >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I've got to commend you in your relentless fight against spammers in > this newsgroup. :) I would too, except for the facts that: 1. 99.5 percent of the spammers never read replies to their postings, so these responses are wasted. 2. Andrew's replies expose those of us who have effective killfiles to parts of the spam that our killfiles had eliminated (unless we want to also killfile Andrew, which I don't!). Cheers GRB  Signature--------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg R. Broderick gregb+usenet200612@blackholio.dyndns.org A. Top posters. Q. What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? --------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mar 25, 5:27 am, "Greg R. Broderick" <gregb +usenet200...@blackholio.dyndns.org> wrote: .. > 1. 99.5 percent of the spammers never read replies to their postings, so > these responses are wasted. As odd as this may seem. My comments are not actually meant for the spammer themselves. > 2. Andrew's replies expose those of us who have effective killfiles to parts > of the spam that our killfiles had eliminated (unless we want to also > killfile Andrew, which I don't!). Good point, and something I have been meaning to check. If I were to put an unique key phrase in the second post to each spam, does your news reader offer the ability to filter the *entire* *thread* based on that? Andrew T. > > 2. Andrew's replies expose those of us who have effective killfiles to > > parts of the spam that our killfiles had eliminated (unless we want to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > to check. If I were to put an unique key phrase > in the second post to each spam, Does the expression "P*ss off" not already suffice for that purpose ? -- chris On Mar 25, 6:52 pm, "Chris Uppal" <chris.up...@metagnostic.REMOVE- THIS.org> wrote: > > > 2. Andrew's replies expose those of us who have effective killfiles to > > > parts of the spam that our killfiles had eliminated (unless we want to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Does the expression "P*ss off" not already suffice for that purpose ? ;-) I use that expression 'regularly' on such posts, but (so far) not every time. I am also a bit worried about the exact string, as I would not want to cause others to 'pAss off' any thread without good cause, and I think the inclusion of the 'wildcard' character might cause problems there. To be more specific, I would want any filter to be a longish and very unusual acronym (maybe?) consisting entirely of letters. Andrew T. > On Mar 24, 7:38 pm, "ketanar...@gmail.com" <ketanar...@gmail.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > c) You are a multi-posting spammer > d) P*ss off. This character obviously did not read this: http://www.agloco.com/web/guest/antispam <BLOCKQUOTE> "AGLOCOT's anti-spam policy, acceptance of which is a condition of our General Membership Agreement, is very simple: if you spam, you are out. Your account will be closed, your referrals will be lost, any benefits due to you will forfeited, and you will be ineligible for a new account." </BLOCKQUOTE> That notwithstanding, the setup looks a little suspect to me. Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.