Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Write Great Computer Program

Thread view: 
oorga.power@gmail.com - 14 Mar 2007 17:12 GMT
Our 90 % percent work based on our mind.
all the successful person of this world won from mind. You can be
Albert Eynsteen, Pablo Picso, Henri Ford . your have the same power
they were had, you can awake to your mind through meditation.
You can write extraordinary program or software codes from cool
technique.
http:\\oorga.tripod.com
You can discover new values,new worlds, new power through meditation.
We can solve our every problem through meditation, however it is
amazing or laughful in listening but this is ture.
as we know our brain works only 5% . so think if you use 50% of our
mind you can imagine what you can do. This is not a joke.
success is based on our work and working style. This is important how
we complete our porgrame more effectivly.
How just visit to this website
http:\\oorga.tripod.com
a24900@googlemail.com - 14 Mar 2007 19:21 GMT
On Mar 14, 5:12 pm, oorga.po...@gmail.com wrote:
> all the successful person of this world won from mind. You can be
> Albert Eynsteen, Pablo Picso, Henri Ford .

Eynsteen? Picso? Henri?

Try to use your method to learn some spelling.

> You can write extraordinary program or software codes from cool
> technique.
> http:\\oorga.tripod.com

Your method didn't work for you. Otherwise you wouldn't be so brain
dead stupid to f.ck up the URL in your idiotic spam. Twice.

> We can solve our every problem through meditation, however it is
> amazing or laughful in listening but this is ture.

Well, it must be "laughful ture", because it is certainly not true.

> we complete our porgrame more effectivly.

You should stop thinking about porn when spamming "effectivly".
Christopher Benson-Manica - 14 Mar 2007 21:23 GMT
> > http:\\(redacted)

> Your method didn't work for you. Otherwise you wouldn't be so brain
> dead stupid to f.ck up the URL in your idiotic spam. Twice.

Would it be possible to at least refrain reposting the URL's included
in "idiotic spam" if you are unable to refrain from replying at all?
Thanks.

Signature

C. Benson Manica           | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
cbmanica(at)gmail.com      | don't, I need to know.  Flames welcome.

a24900@googlemail.com - 15 Mar 2007 19:59 GMT
On Mar 14, 9:23 pm, Christopher Benson-Manica
<a...@faeroes.freeshell.org> wrote:
> Would it be possible to at least refrain reposting the URL's included
> in "idiotic spam" if you are unable to refrain from replying at all?
> Thanks.

Would you look a second time you might noticed that the URL is
invalid.
Lew - 15 Mar 2007 03:18 GMT
oorga.po...@gmail.com wrote:
>> we complete our porgrame more effectivly.

> You should stop thinking about porn when spamming "effectivly".

Oh, porn! Phew! Thank goodness they weren't talking about pogroms!

-- Lew


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.