> No, actually I think I see what he wants to do. Suppose he has a
> product - an application that he is selling on the web. He wants
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> downloading it - in effect, like streaming audio rather than allowing
> the user to download the MP3.
This sort of thing is done with JEE all the time - it's called
"Service-Oriented Architecture" and "portals".
The degree of difficulty is influenced by one's degree of ownership of the
services provided. Extremely exogenous processes may require screen scraping,
or even manual intervention; nepotistic services could share resources directly.
- Lew
>>> Hi!
>>> Im using jsp, and tomcat, what I am trying to is have some file
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> get a copy of the setup program that could then be used to install the
> program on multiple computers.
Right, I can imagine him wanting that... I just don't think it's very
realistic. It reminds me of people asking, "How can I put images on a
web page but stop people from downloading them?" - ultimately, you
can't. If you can see it, you've downloaded it in some form. Methods of
hiding/obfuscating the information exist (e.g. image-viewing flash
movies that download the info in a non-standard format, descramble it,
then show it in the browser), and they can work to a certain extent. But
ultimately, if you put the info out there on a web page, the user can
get the information.
A more common way of doing it is the requiring of a license key for the
software to run... but in the end, same problem: the information is in
the end-users hands. They can mangle it and prod it and edit it and
disable protection, etc. Obviously not trivial to do for exes, but
crackers do that sort of stuff....
> Not likely to work well with a java based product, as unlike typical
> MSWindows programs Java doesn't usually litter files all over the hard
> drive.
Sorry, not quite sure what you mean there.... What is it that won't work
well with a Java product?
> But, he is using jsp as the page technology and is interested
> in how to allow a user to run a program from the server without
> downloading it -
Well, web applications are running on the server side, not the client,
so that is one solution, but it's not a native .exe, obviously. The user
just can't run a program on their own computer with downloading it
somehow, in some form.
> in effect, like streaming audio rather than allowing
> the user to download the MP3.
Streaming audio is in effect actually just downloading an audio file
(but playing the file as it goes along and not saving it to the local
disk). There's a stream setup protocol on top (e.g. RTSP for streaming
video) that to some degree hides where the actual file/data is. But if
you know the protocols you can usually locate the actual file and
download it by using wget or curl on the command line, or just pasting
the actual file's url in your browser, then hitting 'save' if you are
offered the option.
Jeff - 19 Feb 2007 03:30 GMT
> >>> Hi!
> >>> Im using jsp, and tomcat, what I am trying to is have some file
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> the actual file's url in your browser, then hitting 'save' if you are
> offered the option.
When I said it may not work for java apps, what I was referring to is
that Windows apps tend to get littered around the hard drive, with
parts in system directories as well as the application directory, and
entries in the registry to put it all together. It is therefore hard
to just zip up a directory and send it to a friend so they can use the
program to.
Java is much better behaved, but that also means that it is easier to
zip up a directory and send it to a friend and have the application
work on their system. So, a protection scheme that depends on one
time use of an installer is not as likely to work. Once the installer
sets up the application directory and places the files, that directory
can be zipped and sent to a friend.
So, AT's suggestion to change the approach seems best.
Alex Hunsley - 19 Feb 2007 10:01 GMT
> When I said it may not work for java apps, what I was referring to is
> that Windows apps tend to get littered around the hard drive, with
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> So, AT's suggestion to change the approach seems best.
Ah I see, thanks for clarifying. Yup, change of approach seems good.
lex