
Signature
Regards,
Steve
"...which means he created the heaven and the earth... in the DARK! How good
is that?"
> I've seen other sites compromise and have just one all-encompassing
> stylesheet for everything. Is this the best way to go?
I think so. Styles can be written in a fairly compact way, and it would
unusual to need a really big one. An unchanging style sheet will get
cached by the browser, so after your user has hit the first page of your
site, then will be no need ever to fetch the sheet again.
Plus, you're going to have common styles across all the sub pages, so
you need to have at least one common style sheet anyway.
Lew - 05 Jan 2007 02:35 GMT
Steve wrote:
> I have a web-based project (in Eclipse) with some jsp files and in the best
> tradition I have modularized them so the top level jsp has many
> <jsp:include> tags to include other parts. Now, I am using stylesheets
> extensively and I'm having problems working out the best way to get the
> stylesheets included in the page.
> Plus, you're going to have common styles across all the sub pages, so
> you need to have at least one common style sheet anyway.
I do not find big use of <jsp:include> to be a best practice. At all.
On most projects where it (or <%@include...%>) figured prominently, they only
served to fragment the layout, which is IMHO better apprehended when all in a
single artifact (at least, per frame, and exclusive of independent header or
footer blocks). Not only that, there are interactions wrt variable
declarations (in <jsp:useBean...> and the like) that can make maintenance a bitch.
I'd stay away from includes and modularize using backing logic beans, tag
libraries and the MVC pattern instead.
- Lew
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> "...which means he created the heaven and the earth... in the DARK! How good
> is that?"
That is what I have been using?
Berlin Brown
http://www.botspiritcompany/botlist