 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Java Forum / General / December 2006Properties on the Java wishlist
I've used both Java and C# .NET and am a fan of both. I loved Java for generics in 1.5 and Java still rocks at it. C# .NET then incorporated that idea, though it's not as programmer-friendly as Java's solution. I liked the C# .NET bandwagon as the language supported properties - a replacement for regular get and set methods. I really wish Java would incorporate it in the next version. > I've used both Java and C# .NET and am a fan of both. I loved Java for > generics in 1.5 and Java still rocks at it. C# .NET then incorporated [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > replacement for regular get and set methods. I really wish Java would > incorporate it in the next version. The best place to express that might be.. <http://jcp.org/en/home/index> ..or as an RFE through the bug database. (both of which, others can vote for*, and Sun might actually be expected to read). * Assuming they do not vanish into the aether, as sometimes happens with bug reports - have not tried the JCP. Andrew T. > I've used both Java and C# .NET and am a fan of both. I loved Java for > generics in 1.5 and Java still rocks at it. C# .NET then incorporated > that idea, though it's not as programmer-friendly as Java's solution. Really? How are Java's half-assed erased generics friendlier than C#'s complete implementation? >> I've used both Java and C# .NET and am a fan of both. I loved Java for >> generics in 1.5 and Java still rocks at it. C# .NET then incorporated >> that idea, though it's not as programmer-friendly as Java's solution. > > Really? How are Java's half-assed erased generics friendlier than C#'s > complete implementation? Who cares? > I liked the C# .NET bandwagon as the language supported properties - a > replacement for regular get and set methods. I really wish Java would > incorporate it in the next version. Why bother ? It is just get and set with same functionality but different syntax ! It is still coding by convention not something that is enforced by the language/compiler. Arne Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.