> I need a really simple, on-disk, read-only btree to hold a very large
> amount of data. By "read-only" I mean that the tree will get populated
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Any suggestions?
Btree is a compromise between lookup efficiency and efficiency of
insertion, deletion etc. You don't seem to need those compromises.
Why not a simple, dense, hierarchical index structure? The high levels
of the index can be memory resident, reducing disk reads.
Patricia
Chris - 25 Nov 2006 17:49 GMT
>> I need a really simple, on-disk, read-only btree to hold a very large
>> amount of data. By "read-only" I mean that the tree will get populated
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Why not a simple, dense, hierarchical index structure? The high levels
> of the index can be memory resident, reducing disk reads.
Good point. Can you point me to such a structure? Or better yet, a
library that implements one?