Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
atbusbook@aol.com - 13 Oct 2006 01:29 GMT
atbusb...@aol.com wrote:
> Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
> colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
> operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
> programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
> faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
> verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
plus it does not have pointers and other stuff c/asm have for low level
power. so java is the worst of both worlds
Wibble - 13 Oct 2006 02:00 GMT
> atbusb...@aol.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> plus it does not have pointers and other stuff c/asm have for low level
> power. so java is the worst of both worlds
And java isn't as pretty as my girl,
and doesn't taste as good as jello,
and java doesn't keep buy butt warm in the winter like my coat.
It really is the worst of both worlds.
Tor Iver Wilhelmsen - 13 Oct 2006 14:53 GMT
> > atbusb...@aol.com wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> It really is the worst of both worlds.
Java does not have a cure for cancer,
Java does not bring world peace,
and Java cannot carry people to other worlds to colonize.
It really is the worst of both worlds.
Eric Sosman - 13 Oct 2006 02:02 GMT
> Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
> colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
> operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
> programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
> faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
> verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
class Troll {
private final Troll troll;
Troll() {
System.out.println("I am a Troll: " + this);
troll = new Troll();
System.out.println("... who can't even spell.");
}
public static void main(String[] trolls) {
new Troll(); // no self-deprecation
}
}

Signature
Eric Sosman
esosman@acm-dot-org.invalid
John W. Kennedy - 13 Oct 2006 03:13 GMT
> Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
> colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
> operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
> programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
> faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
> verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
*PLONK!*

Signature
John W. Kennedy
"The blind rulers of Logres
Nourished the land on a fallacy of rational virtue."
-- Charles Williams. "Taliessin through Logres: Prelude"
Hendrik Maryns - 13 Oct 2006 09:11 GMT
atbusbook@aol.com schreef:
> comprehanchon
Ooh, I like that one! Never seen before.
H.
- --
Hendrik Maryns
http://tcl.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hendrik/
==================
http://aouw.org
Ask smart questions, get good answers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Jeffrey Schwab - 13 Oct 2006 09:43 GMT
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ooh, I like that one! Never seen before.
Yes, I'm actually having a little trouble comprehanching the poster's
meaning...
Thomas Kellerer - 13 Oct 2006 09:37 GMT
> JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
Then stop using it. Simple as that.

Signature
It's not a RootKit - it's a Sony
Simon Brooke - 13 Oct 2006 11:26 GMT
> Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
> colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
> operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
> programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
> faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
> verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
If you don't like it, don't use it. There are plenty of other languages.
You're right, of course, that Java has a number of compromises. Most of
those compromises derive from the fact that Java (Oak) was originally
designed to run on very low powered devices - and, seeing these days we
mostly run Java on high powered machines, some of these compromises look
very silly. However, it remains a good enough language for most purposes,
with a large set of well designed, well tested components freely
available.

Signature
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; Drivers in the UK kill more people every single year than
;; Al Qaeda have ever killed worldwide in any single year.
Chris Uppal - 13 Oct 2006 12:20 GMT
> JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!
If you are not being paid to use it, then just use something you prefer.
If you /are/ being paid to use it, then reflect that if it were easy and
pleasant to use, nobody would pay you to do so.
-- chris
adwords@pulpjava.com - 13 Oct 2006 14:16 GMT
Java is simple, object-oriented, and easy to use. That's why people
love it.
-Cameron McKenzie
www.scja.com www.pulpjava.com www.examscam.com
Check out my new SCJA certification guides and mock exam questions at
www.scja.com
> Java is worse than ruby for example because it has tacked on
> colections, no dynamic typeing, some things are not objects, no
> operator overloading, no function passing mech or blocks. functional
> programing in java is imposible. it is slow to develop, and is a tad
> faster at runtime than ruby or any other dynamic languige. it is
> verbose beond comprehanchon. JAVA MAKES ME GO INSANE!!!!!!!!