The XOR way of "removing the need of an extra variable" is not at all
intuitive and thus I wouldn't use that way of coding, ever. And the use
of the modulo operator to "loop" through a set of numbers is barely a
trick, it's used pretty much all the time.

But to answer your question, I can't come up with any other tricks
(because those are for kids).

Here is a really useful programming tip: Always use the clearest, most
straightforward, readable way of doing anything, unless you have a very,
very good reason to prefer another method. And when you do have to write
something at all obscure, add comments to explain what you are
doing, and why it really has to be done that way.

A clear, simple piece of code is more likely to get implemented
correctly in the first place and is easier to modify correctly as the
program changes. Perhaps most important of all, it is easier to read.
That affects both your future self, attempting to understand and modify
code you wrote previously, and other programmers who need to work on
your code.

The intent of the swap-via-temp, to exchange two values without
transforming them, is obvious from the form of the code. The xor-swap
looks as though the values are being changed, even though it has the
same net effect. For that reason, swap-via-temp should be preferred
whenever it is feasible.

Patricia