Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ajax Compatability Question

Thread view: 
Tony@ChillAxen.com - 25 Sep 2006 09:50 GMT
compatibility be?  I been scared to include a lot of Javascript into my
sites because I wasn't sure how many people would allow it, but it
seems most major companies are using Javascript for at least form
checking and alerts now a days.

My traffic ratios are
62% IE6
1% IE7
0.4% IE 5.5
31.3% Firefox, mostly 1.0.7 and above
0.2% Netscape, 5.2 and 7.0 each taking equal amounts
0.9% Safari
2.6% unknown
the rest are small portions of each

Please let me know because I would really like to add dynamic
adding/removing of content via AJAX is like 95%+ of the world will
support it.  I do not however want to loose customers because they can
not use my site, just to make it more appealing.

Anthony F Greco
www.ChillAxen.com
hiwa - 25 Sep 2006 10:16 GMT
> compatibility be?  I been scared to include a lot of Javascript into my
> sites because I wasn't sure how many people would allow it, but it
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Anthony F Greco
> www.ChillAxen.com
Use JavaServer Faces(JSF) and Ajax for JavaServer Faces library and you
will never write JavaScript nor XML. You only write JSF view, which is
a hierarchy of components of which AJAX is a subset of their attribute
sets configuration. See https://ajax4jsf.dev.java.net/
Tony@ChillAxen.com - 25 Sep 2006 13:16 GMT
I don't mind writing Javascript one bit.  My question is will my users
be able to use it?  Are most browsers from the last 3 years compatibile
on the default security settings?

> Use JavaServer Faces(JSF) and Ajax for JavaServer Faces library and you
> will never write JavaScript nor XML. You only write JSF view, which is
> a hierarchy of components of which AJAX is a subset of their attribute
> sets configuration. See https://ajax4jsf.dev.java.net/
Andrew Thompson - 25 Sep 2006 13:24 GMT
T...@ChillAxen.com wrote:
> I don't mind writing Javascript one bit.

I mind top-posting a huge bit.
Please refrain from it in future.

>....My question is will my users
> be able to use it?

Your answer is 'no'.

>....Are most browsers from the last 3 years compatibile
> on the default security settings?

Perhaps the questions you should be asking first are..
a) are most browsers, with which your potential
customers are visiting your site, even at the
'default' setting.

b) if not, are they even in a position to change that?
(internet cafe, library, work-place..)

(hiwa)
> > Use JavaServer Faces(JSF)

Of course, using a pure HTML interface(?) will give
you access to a wider range of potential clients,
though even then, you'll find someone using an
old (old) browser that crashes when simple
styles are used!

Andrew T.
Tony@ChillAxen.com - 25 Sep 2006 15:37 GMT
> I mind top-posting a huge bit.
> Please refrain from it in future.

What the heck is top-posting?
Deniz Dogan - 25 Sep 2006 15:43 GMT
Top-posting is responding to a post by typing the response at the very
top. If you know what I mean... This is a top-post.

>> I mind top-posting a huge bit.
>> Please refrain from it in future.
>
> What the heck is top-posting?
hiwa - 25 Sep 2006 23:41 GMT
> I don't mind writing Javascript one bit.  My question is will my users
> be able to use it?  Are most browsers from the last 3 years compatibile
> on the default security settings?
Then, go ahead on your own. I don't want to know such low level details
for variety of browser products.
Standard library like Ajax for JSF might have made your life easier,
though.
Arne Vajhøj - 30 Sep 2006 17:54 GMT
> compatibility be?  I been scared to include a lot of Javascript into my
> sites because I wasn't sure how many people would allow it, but it
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> support it.  I do not however want to loose customers because they can
> not use my site, just to make it more appealing.

I think you can count on a very high percentage of JS
support.

But JS support does not imply that your Ajax will always work.

http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/03/ajax-dhtml-library-scorecard.html
http://www.musingsfrommars.org/2006/06/howre-we-doing-now-ajax-browsers.html

I will (as other have) recommend an Ajax library of some kind.

Arne


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.