 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Java Forum / General / September 2006Which is not allowed in EJB programming ?
Which is not allowed in EJB programming ? (a) Thread Management (b) Transient Fields (c) Listening on a Socket > Which is not allowed in EJB programming ? > > (a) Thread Management > (b) Transient Fields > (c) Listening on a Socket What course are you taking that gives you EJB-specific homework? i found a question paper which has this small question....i dont know the answer. Do you have the answer ? > > Which is not allowed in EJB programming ? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > What course are you taking that gives you EJB-specific homework? > i found a question paper which has this small question....i dont > know the answer. > > Do you have the answer ? You mean someone left a piece of paper lying around, with a question on it but no answer? Who could be so mean? Don't worry about it. If you are answering ..learn how to answer ...its an art. you should know "search google" ,"its in the book" , "this is a homework" are all bad answers I am not here to judge your answering skillset of course. I am surprised to see how people can misunderstood and make big issues on useless things. this is a small question and you started bargaining with a bad notion. If you think this is a home work ...then its very unfortunate about your judicious capacity. BTW, you are always free not to make any comments. if you dont have the answer.....dont comment. > > i found a question paper which has this small question....i dont > > know the answer. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Don't worry about it. (d) bad attitude > If you are answering ..learn how to answer ...its an art. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > > > Don't worry about it. > If you are answering ..learn how to answer ...its an art. We have seen a lot of your kind here. You think you are entitled to an answer. You aren't. You think we are your servants. We aren't. You think you can command us to do what you want. Won't work. You think we are so stupid do buy every story. We don't. You are the one who wants something from us. You better play nice, be honest and play by our rules. > you should know "search google" ,"its in the book" , "this is a > homework" are all bad answers Only for lazy gits. One can greatly benefit from taking the cited answers serious. It's about learning how to learn. > I am not here to judge your answering skillset of course. Sure, that's why you write drivel like "If you are answering ..learn how to answer ...its an art.". > this is a small question Yep, and that's why we think you are trying to cheat with your homework. It is not a real world question. It is a typical homework question. And that's why many people here think your statement >>> i found a question paper which has this small question....i dont >>> know the answer. is an outright lie. "Found a question paper"? Oh sure. > If you think this is a home work ...then its very unfortunate about > your judicious capacity. Sure. Care to show us this mystically found question paper and tell us where you found it? But even in the unlikely event you really "found a question paper", you will benefit more from learning the subject instead of just memorizing the answer. > BTW, you are always free not to make any comments. > > if you dont have the answer.....dont comment. You will not dictate what people answerer or don't. Many people tried on Usenet during the last several decades. They either learned or went away. Non "won", non managed to change people. Oh, and stop top-posting. If you continue, you demonstrate that you don't respect us. Why should we respect you? /Thomas  SignatureThe comp.lang.java.gui FAQ: http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/faqs/faqs-hierarchy/comp/comp.lang.java.gui/ ftp://ftp.cs.uu.nl/pub/NEWS.ANSWERS/computer-lang/java/gui/faq This is a little off topic but I don't know the answer to this so please be patient - what is top posting? Is it when I just write my comments above the post that is pre-populated in the google textarea? Thanks Chris > This is a little off topic but I don't know the answer to this so > please be patient - what is top posting? Try this search string.. <http://www.google.com/search?q=top-post> Andrew T. This is top posting. (See other replies for other examples). -- chris > This is a little off topic but I don't know the answer to this so > please be patient - what is top posting? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Thanks > Chris > This is a little off topic but I don't know the answer to this so > please be patient - what is top posting? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Thanks > Chris This is bottom posting. (see my other replies for other examples). -- chris > please be patient - what is top posting? And this is correct posring. See my other replies for more examples. Clippng the message one is replying to to just enough to given readers the context and contuity without wasting their time scrolling rhrough loads of irrelevancies. > Is it when I just write my comments above the post that is > pre-populated in the google textarea? It has nothing to do with Google expcept that Google encouranges some very bad (i.e. inconvenient for other people) habits. -- chris > Only for lazy gits. One can greatly benefit from taking the cited > answers serious. It's about learning how to learn. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Sure. Care to show us this mystically found question paper and tell us > where you found it? I am proving myself that i am honest here is the paper http://freshersworld.com/placementweek/showpaper.asp?cid=53&pid=1427&pgcount=1&prio=5 I am stuck with this questions. If you are genuine person then i think you wont bargain more and come to the point. IF you have the courage to prove yourself honest then prove it ....otherwise run away. Hope , i am clear to make you understand that this is not homework. i did not start bargaining but someone misunderstood my question and started bad remarks EXCEPT one person who is true gentleman. unfortunately, i can not test this concept otherwsie i could test in my system itself. I am practising objective papers and learning. every person has dignity , i am not supposed to keep mum if i see i am subjected to ill-treated with false reasons while i am clean and desperate to learn. I understand you dont know the answer ...its ok...its not expected also that one person would know everything. please i request answers from genuine person....i am not expecting any answers from fake guys. Have you seen my other posts ? If not, then read those and then analyse it whether the questions i post from some homework or not. dont make any random statements. > But even in the unlikely event you really "found a question paper", you > will benefit more from learning the subject instead of just memorizing [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/faqs/faqs-hierarchy/comp/comp.lang.java.gui/ > ftp://ftp.cs.uu.nl/pub/NEWS.ANSWERS/computer-lang/java/gui/faq >> Only for lazy gits. One can greatly benefit from taking the >> cited answers serious. It's about learning how to learn. ... > I am proving myself that i am honest > > here is the paper ... > I am stuck with this questions. Danno gave you good advice: # Type: "Which is not allowed in EJB programming ?" in Google # and watch the magic fly. Reading the first 2 articles ought # to give you some well rounded info. That is not just telling you to use Google, it is telling you that there actually is something relevant to your question right there. Why don't you go and see? > If you are genuine person then i think you wont bargain more > and come to the point. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Hope , i am clear to make you understand that this is not > homework. The real problem is that you have not shown any effort on your part. > i did not start bargaining but someone misunderstood my > question and started bad remarks EXCEPT one person who is [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > i see i am subjected to ill-treated with false reasons while > i am clean and desperate to learn. You should have said that you are desperate! Here, I went to see what Google had to say, like Danno suggested, and there was a page about this specific question where anita said the answer is (a) and (c) but not (b). Happy now? Memorize the answer: (a) and (c). There was also a short article about "programming restrictions on EJB" that confirmed threads and sockets. When you get over your delusions of desperation, go and see it. Another Google search told me something about "transient fields"; they don't seem to appear in that article, so anita may well be right that they are allowed. > I understand you dont know the answer ...its ok...its not > expected also that one person would know everything. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > dont make any random statements. Keep hiding under a cheap nickname. You may well want to change it some day soon. thanks jussi, thanks for the comments. this was very helpful . thanks for the tips . By The way , who is anita ? come on i dont see anybodys name here anita !! anyway, Thank you > >> Only for lazy gits. One can greatly benefit from taking the > >> cited answers serious. It's about learning how to learn. [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > Keep hiding under a cheap nickname. You may well want to > change it some day soon. ... > By The way , who is anita ? ... I have no idea. She had posted her answer on a web page that Google found when given our subject line to search for. The answer seemed right to me, after reading the other page that actually explained things. > Only for lazy gits. One can greatly benefit from taking the cited > answers serious. It's about learning how to learn. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Sure. Care to show us this mystically found question paper and tell us > where you found it? I am proving myself that i am honest here is the paper http://freshersworld.com/placementweek/showpaper.asp?cid=53&pid=1427&pgcount=1&prio=5 I am stuck with this questions. If you are genuine person then i think you wont bargain more and come to the point. IF you have the courage to prove yourself honest then prove it ....otherwise run away. Hope , i am clear to make you understand that this is not homework. i did not start bargaining but someone misunderstood my question and started bad remarks EXCEPT one person who is true gentleman. unfortunately, i can not test this concept otherwsie i could test in my system itself. I am practising objective papers and learning. every person has dignity , i am not supposed to keep mum if i see i am subjected to ill-treated with false reasons while i am clean and desperate to learn. I understand you dont know the answer ...its ok...its not expected also that one person would know everything. please i request answers from genuine person....i am not expecting any answers from fake guys. Have you seen my other posts ? If not, then read those and then analyse it whether the questions i post from some homework or not. dont make any random statements. > But even in the unlikely event you really "found a question paper", you > will benefit more from learning the subject instead of just memorizing [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/faqs/faqs-hierarchy/comp/comp.lang.java.gui/ > ftp://ftp.cs.uu.nl/pub/NEWS.ANSWERS/computer-lang/java/gui/faq > dont make any random statements. I'll make random statements if I feel like it. You are free to ignore them. >> dont make any random statements. > > I'll make random statements if I feel like it. Right on! Here are some pseudo-random statements from the top of my head. The garblebok simply could not grok the outcomes. Only one in seven stimuli cause ridicule. Even better, here's some Markov text I generated from Pride & Prejudice: It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a most valuable living, had it pleased the gentleman we were speaking at all. Sir William could not have happened. But it is very pretty; but I thought I might as well inquire," replied she, "why with so evident a desire of offending and insulting me, you chose to tell me that before? If I had known as much this morning I certainly would not marry Lydia if he had been able to reason away, was such a succession of rain as prevented their walking to Meryton." Here's another one: "She is so fond of Mrs. Forster," said she, "it is very hard to think that his visit to Rosings was to end on the day after the next--and, a still greater, that in less than a very smart bonnet indeed, or a really new muslin in a shop window, could recall them. > You are free to ignore them. Well, sort of. I ignore spam email, too, but it's still an annoying waste of time. :) GK: I don't think people really mind helping you with your homework, but posting an apparently asinine question without any context is perceived as rude. ... > I am proving myself that i am honest Does this* also prove that you (finallly) understand both top-posting and why it is not welcome? * The first time I have ever observed a reply from you, that was not top-posted. Andrew T. > We have seen a lot of your kind here. Um, you are aware that "gk" is something of a regular around here, aren't you ? He or she is typically askng questions, but they are sensible questions -- not homework, nor anything like it. -- chris > If you think this is a home work ...then its very unfortunate about > your judicious capacity. You should share the blame here. The /only/ thing about your post that wouldn't make any and all sensible observers assume that you were a homework cheat was that you have asked other questions here which weren't homework. So if a person doesn't happen to recognise your name, and it seems that some people didn't, then they /have/ so assume that you are attempting to cheat -- since your post had all the signs of it. As a piece of advice: if you find yourself wanting to post some sort of puzzle or exam-style question that you've found on the Web (or elsewhere), you have to tell people that, tell them where you found it, and explain why you would be interested to here what other people have to say. Without that, you will be assumed to be a cheat every time. You can also help by suggesting your own answer(s) to the questions first, and give your reasons. That's just normal politeness (if you are going to start a discussion then you have to talk too !) As it happens, that's good advice for people wanting help with homework too -- but that's not relevant here ;-) FWIW, all three of (a), (b), and (c) sound dangerous to me, unless they are happening on threads the EJB container doesn't know about. But then, I know very little about EJB... -- chris > FWIW, all three of (a), (b), and (c) sound dangerous to me, unless they > are > happening on threads the EJB container doesn't know about. But then, I > know > very little about EJB... The problem is that EJBs are distributed objects. Generally you don't need to know on which node in the cluster the bean resides. Threads and sockets are inherently tied to a single node. You can't, for example, have a bean listen on a socket and expect it still to work when the bean gets moved to another node. Transient fields on the other hand are fairly harmless, so long as you don't store anything critical in them (because you will lose it when the bean gets moved around). Dan. SignatureDaniel Dyer http://www.dandyer.co.uk > i found a question paper which has this small question....i dont > know the answer. > > Do you have the answer ? Have you typed your question into Google? Type: "Which is not allowed in EJB programming ?" in Google and watch the magic fly. Reading the first 2 articles ought to give you some well rounded info. We here would love to answer more specific questions, so come back when you have some of those. > Which is not allowed in EJB programming ? > > (a) Thread Management > (b) Transient Fields > (c) Listening on a Socket (d) Dry Tuna ;) > Which is not allowed in EJB programming ? > > (a) Thread Management > (b) Transient Fields > (c) Listening on a Socket (d) asking other people to do your homework > (d) asking other people to do your homework Alternate: (d) Post a question in September that looks suspiciously like a homework assignment even though it isn't > (a) Thread Management SignatureDavide Consonni <davideconsonni@virgilio.it> http://csvtosql.sourceforge.net SMOTTAMENTO - Furto di merendine. Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.