> I am working on trying to use a thread to spawn a class I call to run
> in a seperate thread but it has failed. I have a class called
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> It may just be that I do not fully understand what threads are suppose
> to do. Thank you for your advice and wisdom.
You don't need to extend Thread to use threads...instead try this:
public class myconnect2 implements Runnable
{
public void run() {
ConnectDir dc = new ConnectDir();
try
{
dc.open();
}
catch(expectj.ExpectJException error1)
{
System.out.println(error1)
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
myconnect2 threadTest = new myconnect2() /*or however you construct
this class*/
Thread mytest = new Thread(threadTest);
mytest.start();
}
Good luck,
Ben
> It may just be that I do not fully understand what threads are suppose
> to do. Thank you for your advice and wisdom.
Perhaps. You wrote:
> What I have tried but it failed to put in seperate thread:
>
> public class myconnect2 extends Thread
> {
> public void run()
> {
[...]
> }
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> }
> }
That definitely does run the code in a new thread. However, the
difference won't be observable here, because you let the main thread
exit immediately without doing anything else. Threads all your program
to do two things at once (or, at least, interleaved so tightly that they
apparently happen at once); so if you want to get that benefit, your
program will need to do two things. Add the code for that second thing
onto the end of main, and (if your tasks run long enough) you'll be able
to see that they both occur at about the same time.
If all you wanted was to run your program in the background, then you
don't need to change your code to do that. Just tell the operating
system that you want that. For example, on UNIX (at least in common
shells), it's done by adding an ampersand (&) to the end of the command.

Signature
Chris Smith