> I setup an array of combo boxes using the following (some code removed
> such as layout properties):
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> feeling I will have to have a separate ItemListener class setup so that
> I can declare an instance of it.
You can still have an anonymous class, but you need to
remember a reference to the instance so you can pass it to
cbAccountProps[i].removeItemListener() later on.
ItemListener[] snoops =
new ItemListener[cbAccountProps.length];
// ...
for (int i = 0; i < cbAccountProps.length; i++) {
// ...
snoops[i] = new ItemListener() {
public void itemStateChanged(ItemEvent e) {
notifyChanges(hasAccountStatusChanged);
}
};
cbAccountProps[i].addItemListener(snoops[i]);
}
When you want to remove them, use the array that you've
carefully remembered to do
for (int i = 0; i < cbAccountProps.length; ++i)
cpAccountProps[i].removeItemListener(snoops[i]);
// safe to discard snoops now (if they won't be
// re-activated later)

Signature
Eric Sosman
esosman@acm-dot-org.invalid
Brandon McCombs - 17 Aug 2006 03:25 GMT
>> I setup an array of combo boxes using the following (some code removed
>> such as layout properties):
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> // safe to discard snoops now (if they won't be
> // re-activated later)
thanks Eric. That worked great.
> I setup an array of combo boxes using the following (some code removed
> such as layout properties):
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> feeling I will have to have a separate ItemListener class setup so that
> I can declare an instance of it.
Although Eric already gave you a solution to your problem, it doesn't
seem to be necessary to remove and readd the listeners all the time.
You could just keep a boolean variable that specifies whether the user
or the app is changing the state of the components, and modify the
notifyChanges method to take into account the state of the variable. Or
even simpler, after loading data into the dialog after it is opened
just do the reverse of notifyChanges (assuming it is easier to do so
than to remove and readd all listeners.)
Also, you don't need to create a separate listener for each checkbox if
all of the listeners do the same thing. You can just add a single
listener to all checkboxes.
Regards,
Daniel Sjöblom
Brandon McCombs - 18 Aug 2006 05:39 GMT
>> I setup an array of combo boxes using the following (some code removed
>> such as layout properties):
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Regards,
> Daniel Sjöblom
thanks Daniel, I hadn't thought of just making a single listener since
they do in fact all do the same thing. I just created a class after all
and passed that to the addItemListener() for each checkbox. I'll also
look into the idea of reversing the notifyChanges() method. It doesn't
look to be too difficult and it will be shorter than having a list of
addDocumentListener() and removeDocumentListener().
thanks for the input