Obviously the canonical use of semaphores is to ration access to a
finite number of resources, say hard disks or memory buffers. It has
occurred to me that a semaphore could, in theory, also be used to
ration permission to send messages in a TCP-like protocol, where
messages must be acknowledged and sending is permitted only when the
number of unacknowledged messages is less than an arbitrary window
value. Would such a use be categorized as a legitemate use or an
unjustified abuse of a semaphore?

Signature
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
Christopher Benson-Manica - 26 Jun 2006 19:11 GMT
> Obviously the canonical use of semaphores is to ration access to a
Sorry folks, meant to post this to comp.programming.

Signature
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.