Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What are the similarity and difference b/w EBJ and COM+?

Thread view: 
moop™ - 30 May 2006 08:29 GMT
Hi,
As title asks, how to choose b/w them? Thx!
dimitar - 30 May 2006 13:12 GMT
Easy - if you have to integrate with MS solutions only or if you have a
green-field project and lots of MS-trained developers and sys-admins -
go to COM+.

On the other hand, EJB's are multi-vendor single-spec and provide better
interoperability with CORBA and mainframe apps (through JCA connectors.)

You can run your app on any major operating system without major changes
(often without changes at all). This could turn to be quite a benefit if
you want to use the Solaris 10's DTrace for debugging and the production
apps run on HP-UX (or win2k for that matter ;-).

Otherwise, if you do bullet-list style feature comparison, both
platforms are roughly equivalent. The major difference is that MS
promotes single and consistent architecture template and the Java camp
have focused on the diversity and natural selection of the frameworks.

Dimitar


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.