RMI, but I'm sure I'm missing something out.
> Can someone explain to me what are the main advantages of using JMX
> rather than using the just RMI ?
>> From what I understood so far, JMX is just a more convenient way of
> RMI, but I'm sure I'm missing something out.
Do you mean JMS? JMX isn't an alternative to RMI, it's for providing
management functions in an enterprise application (typically via a web
console).
Dan.

Signature
Daniel Dyer
http://www.dandyer.co.uk
79 - 02 May 2006 06:26 GMT
No, i mean JMX.
I want to write a distributed application, where one module (server)
gets requests from other modules (clients). I can do this with RMI by
invoking methods on the server side, but I guess JMX is better. why is
that ?
Daniel Dyer - 02 May 2006 11:23 GMT
> No, i mean JMX.
> I want to write a distributed application, where one module (server)
> gets requests from other modules (clients). I can do this with RMI by
> invoking methods on the server side, but I guess JMX is better. why is
> that ?
No idea, you tell me. Why do you guess that JMX is better?
You could get something working with JMX, but that's not really what the
API is intended for.
Dan.

Signature
Daniel Dyer
http://www.dandyer.co.uk