Has anyone used the new GUI in NetBeans? Is it now as easy to creat UI
with Java as it is with VB?
raisenero - 15 Apr 2006 08:23 GMT
I've been using the NetBeans GUI builder for a few weeks now. Although
my experience with VB is limited to a couple of college courses, I'd
say yes, it's as easy to create a UI with the NetBeans GUI builder as
it is in VB, if not a bit easier. Follow the NetBeans Quickstart GUI
tutorial which only takes about 15 minutes and you'll see how simple it
is.
David Segall - 15 Apr 2006 09:21 GMT
>Has anyone used the new GUI in NetBeans? Is it now as easy to creat UI
>with Java as it is with VB?
I assume you are referring to VB6.0 or earlier. The old NetBeans GUI
designer and those that came with most other IDEs have always made it
almost as easy to design a Java GUI as a VB one. One simply had to
choose absolute positioning and avoid the use of a layout manager
which is how VB does it.
The new designer (and layout manager) make it nearly as easy to design
proper resizable forms. You still have to provide hints as to how you
want elements to resize so it can't be as easy. VB also hides the
properties and methods that it deems unnecessary for a VB programmer.
While this makes VB easier than Java it also causes VB programmers to
make Windows system calls to perform tasks that VB won't allow.
Oliver Wong - 15 Apr 2006 15:52 GMT
> Has anyone used the new GUI in NetBeans? Is it now as easy to creat UI
> with Java as it is with VB?
I don't use NetBeans, but I imagine it will never be "as easy" to create
UI in Java as in VB, because Java has to face a lot of problems that VB
doesn't; for example, supporting multiple look-and-feels. A Java application
has to "look right" on Windows, Linux and OSX, something VB doesn't have to
worry about, for example.
- Oliver
Kroll, Michael - 18 Apr 2006 06:44 GMT
Hello,
julianmino@hotmail.com schrieb:
> Has anyone used the new GUI in NetBeans? Is it now as easy to creat UI
> with Java as it is with VB?
I use NetBeans for some year's and I can say the new Layout-Manager
(Matisse) is greate. See Feature-List at:
http://www.netbeans.org/products/ide/features.html
For my own I think it is better as VB.
Regards
Michael

Signature
http://www.smurfi.de
German NetBeans and GlassFish Site
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - 18 Apr 2006 22:00 GMT
> I use NetBeans for some year's and I can say the new Layout-Manager
> (Matisse) is greate.
Just to be pedantic: The layout manager is called GroupLayout. Project
Matisse creates a graphical GUI builder that is based on GroupLayout.
GroupLayout is part of a Swing layout extension project, and can
be downloaded separatly from Matisse:
<URL:https://swing-layout.dev.java.net/>
<URL:http://www.netbeans.org/kb/articles/matisse.html>
/L

Signature
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lrn@hotpop.com
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'
Thomas Hawtin - 19 Apr 2006 06:59 GMT
> GroupLayout is part of a Swing layout extension project, and can
> be downloaded separatly from Matisse:
It should also be part of Java SE 1.6. Although I would stick to
GrdiBagLayout for serious code.
http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/javax/swing/GroupLayout.html
Tom Hawtin

Signature
Unemployed English Java programmer
http://jroller.com/page/tackline/
David Segall - 19 Apr 2006 15:25 GMT
>I would stick to
>GrdiBagLayout for serious code.
Why?
Thomas Hawtin - 19 Apr 2006 15:28 GMT
>> I would stick to
>> GrdiBagLayout for serious code.
> Why?
Because keeping track of loads of horizontal and vertical, sequential
and parallel GroupLayout.Groups is not fun. It's not a very natural
abstraction to deal with. You know where you are with a nicely numbered
grid.
Tom Hawtin

Signature
Unemployed English Java programmer
http://jroller.com/page/tackline/