Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

January 1st 1 AD ?

Thread view: 
Vitamines - 24 Feb 2006 05:37 GMT
That is a naughty question because there isn't a unique answer.
Contrary to common belief the Gregorian and Julian calendars did not
start from the same base day. January 1st 1 AD (Gregorian) - a Monday -
was January 3rd 1 AD (Julian). Unless I had specified which calendar I
was using you could not answer the question. I am sorry if you wasted
time trying to.
Tim Slattery - 24 Feb 2006 14:13 GMT
>That is a naughty question because there isn't a unique answer.
>Contrary to common belief the Gregorian and Julian calendars did not
>start from the same base day. January 1st 1 AD (Gregorian) - a Monday -
>was January 3rd 1 AD (Julian). Unless I had specified which calendar I
>was using you could not answer the question. I am sorry if you wasted
>time trying to.

There was no Gregorian calendar until 1582. The new calendar was
introduced at that time to correct the Julian (old style) calendars
imprecision. (There were no leap years in the old style calendar. But
the earth's does not orbit the sun in a precise number of days - it's
about 364 1/4 days - so Easter was on its way out of Spring.) In
Catholic countries (Protestant countries didn't come on board for
another hundred years or so), October 4, 1582 (OS) was followed by
October 15, 1582 (NS). Lots of folks were *very* upset about losing
ten days!

Lots of information about calendars at
http://astro.nmsu.edu/~lhuber/leaphist.html

Nobody was using either calendar in what later came to be known as
AD1.

--  
Tim Slattery
Slattery_T@bls.gov
Thomas Fritsch - 24 Feb 2006 14:49 GMT
> There was no Gregorian calendar until 1582. The new calendar was
> introduced at that time to correct the Julian (old style) calendars
> imprecision. (There were no leap years in the old style calendar. But
> the earth's does not orbit the sun in a precise number of days - it's
> about 364 1/4 days - so Easter was on its way out of Spring.)

Just to be pedantic:
The Julian calendar *did* have leap years (1 year of 4), giving an
average year of 365.25 days. The Gregorian calendar has a little fewer
leap years (97 years of 400), giving an average year of 365.2425 days.
This is almost equal to the exact astronomical year of 365.2422 days.

Anyway, this doesn't change your reasoning that Easter was on its way
out of Spring.

Signature

"Thomas:Fritsch$ops:de".replace(':','.').replace('$','@')

Roedy Green - 24 Feb 2006 15:12 GMT
>There was no Gregorian calendar until 1582.

The world gradually adopted it. I have documented inside BigDate some
of this lore.  http://mindprod.com/products1.html#COMMON11

Some parts of the world still have not. Measurement of time and
religion have been strongly linked for a long time.

Under http://mindprod.com/jgloss/leapyear.html
I discuss some of the refinements proposed on the Gregorian scheme.

Much of the flipover happened under stress of WW II, so it is not even
known when it officially happened.
Signature

Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.



Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.