Because:

a) That guy multiposted

b) That guy posted advertising to non-advertising newsgroups

c) The site is run by some company "Rytell Corporation" with apparently
some business interest. The original poster phrite@gmail.com alias
brandonb, alias Brandon E. Burr is the CEO of Rytell.

d)  a) + b) + c) = spam.

e) The posting was full of buzzwords, and snake oil salesman wordings,
but very low on substance.

f) That guy drank too much Web 2.0 kool-aid.

g) Yet another one who wants to tell "us" he has found the silver
bullet. But of course fails to explain what it should be.

h) Rytell own corporate web site (http://www.rytell.com/) tells users
"©2005 Rytell Corporation. Only for use within the United States and the
District of Columbia". Ups, a bade case of Xenophobia? I find such
people more than annoying. Apparently people like me are anyhow not
welcome on Rytell web sites.

i) Drive-by-posters like the OP don't contribute to the group.

j) I consider it rather impolite to try to lure users from one
discussion group to another discussion forum. It harms the community,
because it fragments it even more.

k) Luring away people also harms this newsgroup directly. Why should
people in this group be friendly to people who effectively set out to
harm, even destroy, it?

/Thomas

Dito to Roedy.

With so much negativism in the world and especially in most news groups, it
makes me wonder how mankind
ever crawled out of the stone-ages sometimes.

Roedy Green schreef:

If someone in a bar would tell me exactly the same, my response wouldn't
be different. Except if it was mean guy bigger than me or if it was a
pretty girl. ;-)