Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

stand-alone JMS, other JDBC operations, and transactions ( ActiveMQ + JOTM + JDBC operations )

Thread view: 
Jesus M. Salvo Jr. - 10 Feb 2006 08:21 GMT
I need JDBC operations to be included with JMS transactions.

The quick answer would be to use JTA ... but I am not using any application
server nor any transaction manager.

Furthermore, I only have one database ( Sybase ), and I would like to use
Sybase via JConnect JDBC as the persistence for ActiveMQ, but also use the
same Sybase database for JDBC operations ... and have these external JDBC
operations and JMS sessions "combined into a single transaction". ( That is,
when I consume a message from the queue, I would do other JDBC
operations ... and that all of these should be treated as one
transaction ).

The closest thing that I can find is JOTM, an open source Java Transaction
Manager JTA implementation.

Has anyone used ActiveMQ  + JOTM ( no other appserver, no JNDI, etc. ) and
have JMS transactions and JDBC transactions managed by JOTM ??

What I am also concerned about is that, at the time that the article was
published and when the feedbacks were posted, according to someone ( from a
commercial competitor ) at that time, JOTM does not provide recovery:

http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/07/30/jotm_transactions.html?page=2

Things must have changed since then for JOTM, and it appears it already
provides recovery .. though since I am no expert with XA or JTA, I do not
know if the recovery provided by JOTM is up to the required standard.
Ian Mills - 11 Feb 2006 18:17 GMT
> I need JDBC operations to be included with JMS transactions.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> provides recovery .. though since I am no expert with XA or JTA, I do not
> know if the recovery provided by JOTM is up to the required standard.

The way I have done this in the past is to read the message off the
queue, do the requied database operations, commit to the database and
then consume the message from the queue. If anything fails during the
database operations do a rollback and leave the message on the queue.
Admitedly this does leave a slight possibility that the data could be
commited to the database and the system crashing before the message is
consumed. There may be other ways of doing this but this is a simple
method of combining the two in to the same transaction.
robert - 11 Feb 2006 18:33 GMT
> I need JDBC operations to be included with JMS transactions.
>
> The quick answer would be to use JTA ... but I am not using any application
> server nor any transaction manager.

I've never used JTOM, but I have used the transaction manager from the
spring framework, with lots of success.

http://www.springframework.org/docs/reference/transaction.html

Spring also has a lot of support for activemq:

http://activemq.org/Spring+Support

HTH,
robert
http://www.braziloutsource.com/


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.